Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Oct 30;11(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00187.
Global health and development (GHD) systems that centralize power in the Global North were conceived during colonialism. As a result, they often replicate unequal power structures, maintaining dogged inequities. Growing and historic calls to decolonize GHD advocate for the transfer of power to actors in the Global South. This article identifies examples of colonial legacies in today's GHD projects and offers actionable strategies to decolonize.
From August 2021 to March 2022, 20 key informants across 15 organizations participated in interviews about their experiences and perspectives relating to the decolonization of GHD. We used deductive thematic coding to identify examples of challenges and strategies to address them across 3 project life cycle phases: conceptualization and contracting, program planning and implementation, and program evaluation and dissemination.
Participants described how power is maintained in the Global North, sharing countless examples across the project life cycle, including agenda-setting with minimal local participation or partnership, onerous requirements that limit grantee eligibility, Global North ownership of data collected by and in the Global South, and dissemination in languages and formats that are not easily accessible to Global South audiences. Proposed strategies to decolonize GHD projects include having built-in participatory processes and accountability mechanisms; aligning solicitations with existing local strategies; adapting the process for awarding, contracting, and evaluating investments to increase the representation and competitiveness of Global South entities; creating trusting, respectful relationships with Global South partners; and systematically applying power analyses to each step of the project life cycle.
GHD practitioners suggested project life cycle-based strategies for shifting power and redistributing resources, which we argue will ultimately enhance the value, impact, and sustainability of GHD programming.
全球健康与发展(GHD)系统将权力集中在北方国家,这是在殖民主义时期构想的。因此,它们经常复制不平等的权力结构,维持顽固的不平等。越来越多的人呼吁对 GHD 进行非殖民化,主张将权力移交给南方国家的行动者。本文在今天的 GHD 项目中识别了殖民遗留问题的例子,并提供了非殖民化的可行策略。
从 2021 年 8 月到 2022 年 3 月,15 个组织的 20 名关键信息提供者参与了关于他们在 GHD 非殖民化方面的经验和观点的访谈。我们使用演绎主题编码来确定项目生命周期的三个阶段(概念化和签约、项目规划和实施、项目评估和传播)中遇到的挑战和解决这些挑战的策略的例子。
参与者描述了如何在北方国家保持权力,在项目生命周期中分享了无数的例子,包括在几乎没有当地参与或合作的情况下制定议程、规定限制受赠者资格的繁重要求、北方国家拥有在南方国家收集的数据、以及以南方国家受众不易访问的语言和格式传播。GHD 项目非殖民化的建议策略包括:内置参与性流程和问责机制;使征集与现有当地战略保持一致;调整授予、签约和评估投资的流程,以增加南方实体的代表性和竞争力;与南方合作伙伴建立信任、尊重的关系;以及系统地将权力分析应用于项目生命周期的每一个步骤。
GHD 从业者提出了基于项目生命周期的权力转移和资源再分配策略,我们认为这些策略最终将提高 GHD 方案的价值、影响和可持续性。