Daffé Zeinabou Niamé, Guillaume Yodeline, Ivers Louise C
1Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 19;105(3):557-560. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0187.
The movement to decolonize global health and address power inequities among its actors is not new. Founded on the work of colonized and marginalized people themselves, initiatives at universities, schools of public health, and international development organizations have emerged to call for anti-racism and anti-colonialism within the field. US Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) have been less vocal in this wider discussion, despite their large engagement in the field through clinical, research, and medical education activities. As global health practitioners currently based at an AMC, we believe that it is important to critically evaluate our practices. We therefore propose three starting questions for our colleagues and students to consider and act upon as they adopt and navigate a praxis in anti-racism and anti-colonialism as foundational principles in global health. These questions call on us to closely examine the legacies of racism and colonialism in global health, the value placed on different ways of knowing in this field, and our motivations for engaging in this work. They are presented as a tool to reexamine global health, challenging the constructed binary of the "global South" and "global North," and the perceived ideas of poverty and resource scarcity as the natural immutable reality of the global South.
使全球卫生非殖民化并解决其行为主体之间权力不平等问题的运动并非新鲜事。基于被殖民和边缘化群体自身的工作,大学、公共卫生学院及国际发展组织已发起倡议,呼吁该领域开展反种族主义和反殖民主义行动。美国学术医疗中心(AMC)虽通过临床、研究和医学教育活动深度参与该领域,但在这场更广泛的讨论中却较少发声。作为目前就职于一家AMC的全球卫生从业者,我们认为批判性地评估我们的实践非常重要。因此,我们为同事和学生提出三个起始问题,供他们在将反种族主义和反殖民主义实践作为全球卫生基本原则加以采用和践行时进行思考并采取行动。这些问题促使我们仔细审视全球卫生领域中种族主义和殖民主义的遗留影响、该领域对不同认知方式的重视程度以及我们从事这项工作的动机。它们是重新审视全球卫生的一种工具,挑战了 “全球南方” 和 “全球北方” 的既定二元划分,以及将贫困和资源稀缺视为全球南方天然不变现实的固有观念。