Kenny R A, Ingram A, Mitsuoka T, Walsh K, Sutton R
Br Heart J. 1986 Nov;56(5):463-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.56.5.463.
A within patient double blind prospective study of symptoms and exercise tolerance was designed to determine the preferred pacing mode in 10 patients with programmable dual chamber pacemakers who also had angina pectoris. Patients were randomly allocated to one month in each of the following modes: ventricular pacing at 70 beats/min (VVI) or atrioventricular synchronous upper rate 150 beats/min (DDD 150) or 100 beats/min (DDD 100). Medications were unchanged throughout the study; none was taking beta blockers. At the end of each month patients underwent an exercise test. During each month patients recorded symptoms and their preferred pacing mode. DDD 100 was the preferred mode (seven patients). There was significantly less chest pain with this mode than with either of the other modes. There were significantly more episodes of dizziness in VVI, and two patients who developed pacemaker syndrome were unable to complete the pacing period. Three patients developed angina during exercise testing in DDD 150. Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing is better than ventricular pacing for the control of symptoms in patients with angina pectoris provided that the upper atrial tracking rate is limited.
一项针对症状和运动耐量的患者内双盲前瞻性研究旨在确定10名患有可编程双腔起搏器且患有心绞痛的患者的首选起搏模式。患者被随机分配到以下每种模式下各一个月:心室以70次/分钟起搏(VVI),或房室同步上限频率为150次/分钟(DDD 150)或100次/分钟(DDD 100)。在整个研究过程中药物保持不变;无人服用β受体阻滞剂。每个月结束时患者接受运动测试。在每个月期间患者记录症状及其首选起搏模式。DDD 100是首选模式(7名患者)。此模式下的胸痛明显少于其他任何一种模式。VVI模式下头晕发作明显更多,并且两名出现起搏器综合征的患者无法完成起搏期。在DDD 150模式下,有3名患者在运动测试期间出现心绞痛。对于患有心绞痛的患者,只要心房跟踪上限频率受限,心房同步心室起搏在控制症状方面优于心室起搏。