Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jan;103(1):85-92. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14700. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
We aimed to compare placental size and placental size relative to fetal size (ratio) in ongoing pregnancies examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at gestational week 36 with placental size among all deliveries at gestational week 36 during the same time period.
Ongoing unselected singleton pregnancies (n = 89) were examined by MRI at median gestational week 36+5 days during 2017-2018, and placental and fetal volumes (cm ) were calculated. The placental size and ratio in ongoing pregnancies were compared with placental size and ratio among all deliveries in Norway at gestational week 36 (median gestational week 36+4 days) during 2016-2019 (n = 5582). For comparison of size, we converted volume (cm ) in ongoing pregnancies into grams as: cm × 1.05 (density of placental and fetal tissue).
In ongoing pregnancies, median placental size was 873 (interquartile range [IQR] 265) grams and median size of all delivered placentas was 613 (IQR 290) grams. Placental size was smaller among the delivered placentas independent of delivery mode: 760 (IQR 387) grams among elective cesarean deliveries (n = 465) and 590 (IQR 189) grams among vaginal deliveries after spontaneous onset of labor (n = 2478). Median ratio in ongoing pregnancies was higher than among deliveries: 0.31 (IQR 0.08) vs 0.21 (IQR 0.08). The ratio was higher in ongoing pregnancies independent of delivery mode: 0.24 (IQR 0.17) among elective cesarean deliveries vs 0.21 (IQR 0.05) among vaginal deliveries after spontaneous onset of labor.
The placenta is larger in ongoing pregnancies than among deliveries. This finding suggests that placental size decreases during labor and delivery, possibly by transfer of blood to the fetus. Our finding also suggests that reference values of placental size based on delivered placentas are not valid for ongoing pregnancies.
我们旨在比较在 36 孕周行磁共振成像(MRI)检查的持续妊娠与同一时期所有 36 孕周分娩的胎盘大小以及胎盘相对于胎儿大小的比值(比例)。
在 2017-2018 年期间,我们对 89 例未经选择的单胎妊娠进行了中位数为 36+5 孕周的 MRI 检查,并计算了胎盘和胎儿的体积(cm)。将持续妊娠中的胎盘大小和比值与挪威在 2016-2019 年期间所有 36 孕周分娩(中位数为 36+4 孕周)中的胎盘大小和比值进行比较(n=5582)。为了比较大小,我们将持续妊娠中的体积(cm)转换为克,公式为:cm×1.05(胎盘和胎儿组织的密度)。
在持续妊娠中,胎盘大小中位数为 873(四分位距[IQR]265)克,所有分娩胎盘的大小中位数为 613(IQR 290)克。无论分娩方式如何,分娩胎盘的大小都较小:选择性剖宫产分娩(n=465)胎盘大小为 760(IQR 387)克,自发性临产阴道分娩(n=2478)胎盘大小为 590(IQR 189)克。持续妊娠中的比值中位数高于分娩:0.31(IQR 0.08)比 0.21(IQR 0.08)。无论分娩方式如何,持续妊娠中的比值都较高:选择性剖宫产分娩为 0.24(IQR 0.17),自发性临产阴道分娩为 0.21(IQR 0.05)。
与分娩相比,持续妊娠中的胎盘较大。这一发现表明,胎盘大小在分娩过程中会减少,可能是通过将血液转移到胎儿。我们的发现还表明,基于分娩胎盘的胎盘大小参考值不适用于持续妊娠。