Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy, France (Dr Quibel, XX Rozenberg, XX Duvillier, and XX C Bouyer); Clinical Epidemiology, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Team U1018, University of Paris-Saclay, Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France (Dr Quibel, XX Rozenberg, and XX Duvillier).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy, France (Dr Quibel, XX Rozenberg, XX Duvillier, and XX C Bouyer); Clinical Epidemiology, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Team U1018, University of Paris-Saclay, Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France (Dr Quibel, XX Rozenberg, and XX Duvillier).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Feb;5(2):100808. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100808. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
The results of American observational studies and 1 large, randomized trial show that elective induction of labor among nulliparous women can reduce cesarean delivery rates and suggest that gestational age at delivery may be a risk factor for cesarean delivery in pregnancies managed expectantly. However, data on the risk of cesarean delivery at term in ongoing pregnancies are sparse, especially in high-income countries, and further information is needed to explore the external validity of these previous studies.
This study aimed to evaluate the risk of cesarean delivery for each gestational week of ongoing pregnancy in nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in the cephalic presentation at term in a French population.
This retrospective study was conducted in a perinatal network of 10 maternity units from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, and included all nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in the cephalic presentation who gave birth at term (≥37 0/7 weeks of gestation). From the start of term (37 completed weeks) and at the start of each subsequent week of completed gestation (each week + 0 days), ongoing pregnancy was defined as that of a woman who was still pregnant and who gave birth at any time after that date. For each week of gestation for these ongoing pregnancies, the cesarean delivery rate was defined as the number of cesarean deliveries performed in each ongoing pregnancy group divided by the number of women in this group. Separate models for each week of gestation, adjusted by maternal characteristics and hospital status, were used to compare the cesarean delivery risk between ongoing pregnancies and those delivered the preceding week. The same methods were applied to subgroups defined according to the mode of labor onset. Odds ratios were calculated after adjusting for maternal age and educational level, presence of severe preeclampsia, and maternity unit status.
The study included 11,308 nulliparous women, 2544 (22.5%) of whom had a cesarean delivery. These rates remained stable for ongoing pregnancies at 37 0/7, 38 0/7, and 39 0/7 weeks of gestation; the rates were 22.5% (95% confidence interval, 21.7-23.2), 22.6% (95% confidence interval, 21.8-23.3); and 22.7% (95% confidence interval, 21.9-23.6), respectively. The risk of cesarean delivery started to increase in ongoing pregnancies at 40 0/7 weeks of gestation (24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 23.1-25.4) and especially at 41 0/7 weeks of gestation (30.7%; 95% confidence interval, 28.9-32.5). Similar trends were also shown for all modes of labor onset and in every maternity unit. In univariate and multivariate analyses, ongoing pregnancy at or beyond 40 0/7 weeks of gestation was associated with a higher risk of cesarean delivery than pregnancy delivered the previous week: 24.3% of ongoing pregnancies at 40 0/7 weeks of gestation vs 19.9% of deliveries between 39 0/7 weeks of gestation and 39 6/7 weeks of gestation. The odds ratios were 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.44) or 30.4% of ongoing pregnancies at 41 0/7 weeks of gestation vs 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.96) or 19.6% of deliveries between 40 0/7 weeks of gestation and 40 6/7 weeks of gestation.
Cesarean delivery rates increased starting at 40 0/7 weeks of gestation in ongoing pregnancies regardless of the mode of labor onset.
美国的观察性研究和一项大型随机试验的结果表明,选择性诱导分娩可降低初产妇的剖宫产率,并提示分娩时的妊娠龄可能是期待治疗妊娠中剖宫产的风险因素。然而,关于足月妊娠中持续性妊娠的剖宫产风险的数据很少,尤其是在高收入国家,需要进一步的信息来探讨这些先前研究的外部有效性。
本研究旨在评估法国人群中头位单胎足月初产妇持续性妊娠的每一周妊娠的剖宫产风险。
这是一项回顾性研究,于 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日在一个围产期网络的 10 个产科单位进行,包括所有在头位分娩、足月(≥37 0/7 周)的初产妇。从足月开始(37 周完成)和随后的每一周(每周+0 天)开始,持续性妊娠定义为仍处于妊娠状态并在该日期后任何时间分娩的孕妇。对于这些持续性妊娠的每一周妊娠,剖宫产率定义为在每个持续性妊娠组中进行剖宫产的人数除以该组中的妇女人数。对于每个妊娠周,使用调整了母亲特征和医院状况的单独模型,将持续性妊娠的剖宫产风险与前一周分娩的妊娠进行比较。同样的方法适用于根据临产模式定义的亚组。在调整了母亲年龄和教育水平、严重子痫前期的存在和产科单位状况后,计算了比值比。
研究纳入了 11308 名初产妇,其中 2544 名(22.5%)行剖宫产。37 0/7、38 0/7 和 39 0/7 周时持续性妊娠的剖宫产率保持稳定;分别为 22.5%(95%置信区间,21.7-23.2)、22.6%(95%置信区间,21.8-23.3)和 22.7%(95%置信区间,21.9-23.6)。40 0/7 周时持续性妊娠的剖宫产风险开始增加(24.3%;95%置信区间,23.1-25.4),尤其是在 41 0/7 周时(30.7%;95%置信区间,28.9-32.5)。所有临产模式和每个产科单位也显示出类似的趋势。在单变量和多变量分析中,与前一周分娩相比,40 0/7 周或以上的持续性妊娠与更高的剖宫产风险相关:40 0/7 周的持续性妊娠为 24.3%,而 39 0/7 周至 39 6/7 周的分娩为 19.9%。比值比为 1.28(95%置信区间,1.15-1.44)或 41 0/7 周的持续性妊娠为 30.4%,而 40 0/7 周至 40 6/7 周的分娩为 1.73(95%置信区间,1.51-1.96)或 19.6%。
无论临产模式如何,持续性妊娠的剖宫产率从 40 0/7 周开始增加。