Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;183(1):389-402. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05280-x. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) face various healthcare choices to be made during the disease process that may impact their lives. Shared decision-making (SDM) could improve their health outcomes. We assessed if, and to what extent, paediatricians engage children with SCD and/or their parents in the decision-making process. In this observational cross-sectional study, paediatric SCD patients and their parents visiting the outpatient paediatrics clinic of a university hospital participated in a SDM baseline measurement. Two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from the audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument, a 0-20-point scale from which scores are usually expressed as a percentage of ideal SDM. The level of SDM, as perceived by patients, parents and paediatricians, was appreciated using the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Scores could range from 0% (no SDM) to 100% (exemplary SDM). Twenty-four consultations in which a decision needed to be made about SCD treatment were audiotaped and analysed; six were from each paediatrician. The group consisted of 17 male and 7 female patients from various cultural backgrounds between 2 and 17 years old, with a mean age of 9.4 years (SD 4.2). Median OPTION-5 scores were 25.0% [IQR] 20.0-40.0%; range 0-55%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 56.7% (IQR 39.4-88.9%) and 68.9% (IQR 57.8-77.8%), respectively.
Although subjective scores of SDM were fair, the objectively scored level of SDM among children suffering from SCD leaves room for improvement. This may be realized by increasing knowledge about the benefits of SDM, child-centred SDM interventions and SDM-training for paediatricians that takes into account the complexity of intercultural challenges and risk communication between stakeholders.
• Children that suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are more vulnerable to factors that negatively impact the care that they receive as well as suboptimal health outcomes. • Shared decision-making (SDM) can help children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about their preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes.
• The level of participation in the decision-making process for patients suffering from SCD and the families that they belong to leaves room for improvement. The impact of intercultural challenges and the quality and consistency of risk-communication between stakeholders in paediatric SDM needs further exploration. • Paediatricians are more confident about their ability to involve the child and parents compared to how children and their parents experience their level of involvement in a shared decision-making process.
儿童患有镰状细胞病(SCD),在疾病过程中需要做出各种医疗保健选择,这些选择可能会影响他们的生活。共同决策(SDM)可以改善他们的健康结果。我们评估儿科医生是否以及在何种程度上让患有 SCD 的儿童及其父母参与决策过程。在这项观察性横断面研究中,患有 SCD 的儿科患者及其父母在大学医院的儿科门诊就诊,参与了 SDM 的基线测量。两名评估员使用 OPTION-5 工具(0-20 分制,通常以理想 SDM 的百分比表示分数),从咨询的音频记录中独立且客观地分析了患者参与决策的程度。患者、父母和儿科医生分别使用 SDM-Q-9 和 SDM-Q-Doc 问卷评估对 SDM 的感知程度。分数可以从 0%(无 SDM)到 100%(示范 SDM)。对需要就 SCD 治疗做出决定的 24 次咨询进行了录音和分析;每个儿科医生有 6 次。该组由来自不同文化背景的 17 名男性和 7 名女性患者组成,年龄在 2 至 17 岁之间,平均年龄为 9.4 岁(SD 4.2)。中位数 OPTION-5 得分为 25.0%[IQR]20.0-40.0%;范围 0-55%)。中位数 SDM-Q-9 和 SDM-Q-Doc 分数分别为 56.7%(IQR 39.4-88.9%)和 68.9%(IQR 57.8-77.8%)。
尽管 SDM 的主观评分尚可,但患有 SCD 的儿童的 SDM 客观评分仍有改进的空间。可以通过增加对 SDM 益处、以儿童为中心的 SDM 干预措施以及考虑利益相关者之间的跨文化挑战和风险沟通复杂性的儿科医生 SDM 培训来实现这一目标。
患有镰状细胞病(SCD)的儿童更容易受到各种因素的影响,这些因素会对他们所接受的护理产生负面影响,并导致他们的健康结果不理想。共同决策(SDM)可以帮助儿童参与关于他们首选治疗方案的协作决策过程,并改善他们的健康结果。
患有 SCD 的儿童及其所属家庭在决策过程中的参与度有待提高。需要进一步探讨跨文化挑战的影响以及利益相关者之间风险沟通的质量和一致性在儿科 SDM 中的作用。儿科医生对自己让儿童和父母参与共同决策过程的能力更有信心,而儿童及其父母对他们参与共同决策过程的程度的体验却并非如此。