Fouda Khaled Z, Eladl Hadaya M, Ameer Mariam A, Allam Nesma M
Department of Basic Science for Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Science, Jouf University, Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ann Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct;47(5):393-402. doi: 10.5535/arm.23058. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
: To assess the effectiveness of combining physiotherapy techniques with conservative medical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients.
: Sixty-eight volunteers with CRS were randomly assigned. Group A received only traditional medical treatment, whereas group B received a physiotherapy program that included pulsed ultrasound therapy, sinus manual drainage techniques, and self-sinus massage technique in addition to traditional medical treatment. Interventions were applied 3 sessions a week for 4 weeks. The rhinosinusitis disability index (RSDI) served as the main outcome indicator for assessing the quality of life, and the secondary outcome measure was the pressure pain threshold (PPT) using a pressure algometer.
: Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed a significant reduction (p<0.001) in total RSDI values from 71.08±1.13 pretest to 47.14±1.15 posttest for group A, while it decreased from 70.64±1.20 pretreatment to 31.76±1.04 posttreatment for group B; furthermore, Mann-Whitney U-test revealed a significant difference (p<0.001) in total RSDI values between both groups when comparing the change of the pre-post data values, it was 23.94±0.95 for group A and 38.88±0.67 for group B. The independent t-test revealed a highly statistically significant increase (p<0.001) in the PPT values in the experimental group compared to the control group.
: The physiotherapy program which included pulsed ultrasound therapy, sinus manual drainage technique, and self-sinus massage technique in conjunction with conventional medical treatment was more beneficial for enhancing the quality of life and PPT than traditional medical treatment alone in CRS patients.
评估物理治疗技术与保守药物治疗相结合对慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)患者的疗效。
将68名CRS志愿者随机分组。A组仅接受传统药物治疗,而B组除传统药物治疗外,还接受包括脉冲超声治疗、鼻窦手法引流技术和鼻窦自我按摩技术的物理治疗方案。每周进行3次干预,共4周。鼻窦炎残疾指数(RSDI)作为评估生活质量的主要结局指标,次要结局指标是使用压力痛觉计测量的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。
Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示,A组的总RSDI值从测试前的71.08±1.13显著降低(p<0.001)至测试后的47.14±1.15,而B组从治疗前的70.64±1.20降至治疗后的31.76±1.04;此外,Mann-Whitney U检验显示,比较两组前后数据值的变化时,两组总RSDI值存在显著差异(p<0.001),A组为23.94±0.95,B组为38.88±0.67。独立t检验显示,与对照组相比,实验组的PPT值有高度统计学意义的增加(p<0.001)。
在CRS患者中,包括脉冲超声治疗、鼻窦手法引流技术和鼻窦自我按摩技术的物理治疗方案与传统药物治疗相结合,比单纯传统药物治疗更有利于提高生活质量和PPT。