William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Genes & Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Pharmacogenomics J. 2023 Nov;23(6):185-194. doi: 10.1038/s41397-023-00317-8. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
South Asian ancestry populations are underrepresented in genomic studies and therapeutics trials. British South Asians suffer from multi-morbidity leading to polypharmacy. Our objective was to elucidate British South Asian ancestry community perspectives on pharmacogenomic implementation and sharing pharmacogenomic clinical data for research.
Four focus groups were conducted (9-12 participants in each). Two groups were mixed gender, while one group was male only and one was female only. Simultaneous interpretation was available to participants in Urdu and Bengali. Focus groups were recorded and abridged transcription and thematic analysis were undertaken.
There were 42 participants, 64% female. 26% were born in the UK or Europe. 52% were born in Bangladesh and 17% in Pakistan. 36% reported university level education. Implementation of pharmacogenomics was perceived to be beneficial to individuals but pose a risk of overburdening resource limited systems. Pharmacogenomic research was perceived to be beneficial to the community, with concerns about data privacy and misuse. Data sharing was desirable if the researchers did not have a financial stake, and benefits would be shared. Trust was the key condition for the acceptability of both clinical implementation and research. Trust was linked with medication compliance. Education, outreach, and communication facilitate trust.
CONCLUSIONS (SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY): Pharmacogenomics implementation with appropriate education and communication has the potential to enhance trust and contribute to increased medication compliance. Trust drives data sharing, which would enable enhanced representation in research. Representation in scientific evidence base could cyclically enhance trust and compliance.
南亚血统人群在基因组研究和治疗试验中代表性不足。英国南亚人患有多种疾病,导致多种药物并用。我们的目的是阐明英国南亚裔社区对实施药物基因组学和为研究分享药物基因组学临床数据的看法。
进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论(每组 9-12 名参与者)。两组是男女混合,一组是男性,一组是女性。乌尔都语和孟加拉语同时提供口译。对焦点小组进行录音和缩写转录,并进行主题分析。
共有 42 名参与者,其中 64%为女性。26%出生在英国或欧洲。52%出生在孟加拉国,17%出生在巴基斯坦。36%报告受过大学教育。实施药物基因组学被认为对个人有益,但也存在给资源有限的系统带来过重负担的风险。药物基因组学研究被认为对社区有益,但对数据隐私和滥用表示担忧。如果研究人员没有经济利益,并且利益将得到共享,那么数据共享是可取的。信任是临床实施和研究可接受性的关键条件。信任与药物依从性有关。教育、外展和沟通有助于建立信任。
结论(研究的意义和影响):在进行适当的教育和沟通的情况下实施药物基因组学,有可能增强信任,提高药物依从性。信任推动数据共享,从而使研究中的代表性增强。在科学证据基础中的代表性可能会循环增强信任和依从性。