• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识管理工具和机制在世界卫生组织欧洲区域循证决策中的应用:范围综述。

Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Knowledge to Policy Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Oct 31;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01058-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-023-01058-7
PMID:37907919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10619313/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge management (KM) emerged as a strategy to promote evidence-informed decision-making. This scoping review aims to map existing KM tools and mechanisms used to promote evidence-informed health decision-making in the WHO European Region and identify knowledge gaps.

METHODS

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for conducting scoping reviews, we searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Open Grey. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the general characteristics of the included papers and conducted narrative analysis of the included studies and categorized studies according to KM type and phase.

RESULTS

Out of 9541 citations identified, we included 141 studies. The KM tools mostly assessed are evidence networks, surveillance tools, observatories, data platforms and registries, with most examining KM tools in high-income countries of the WHO European region. Findings suggest that KM tools can identify health problems, inform health planning and resource allocation, increase the use of evidence by policymakers and stimulate policy discussion.

CONCLUSION

Policymakers and funding agencies are called to support capacity-building activities, and future studies to strengthen KM in the WHO European region particularly in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. An updated over-arching strategy to coordinate KM activities in the WHO European region will be useful in these efforts.

摘要

背景

知识管理(KM)作为一种促进循证决策的策略应运而生。本范围综述旨在绘制在世界卫生组织欧洲区域中用于促进循证卫生决策的现有 KM 工具和机制,并确定知识差距。

方法

根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)进行范围综述的指南,我们检索了 Medline、PubMed、EMBASE、考科蓝图书馆和 Open Grey。我们对纳入论文的一般特征进行了描述性分析,并对纳入的研究进行了叙述性分析,并根据 KM 类型和阶段对研究进行了分类。

结果

在确定的 9541 条引文中,我们纳入了 141 项研究。评估的 KM 工具主要是证据网络、监测工具、观测站、数据平台和登记处,其中大多数研究都在世界卫生组织欧洲区域的高收入国家中检验了 KM 工具。研究结果表明,KM 工具可以识别健康问题、为卫生规划和资源分配提供信息、增加政策制定者对证据的使用并促进政策讨论。

结论

决策者和资助机构被呼吁支持能力建设活动,未来的研究将加强世界卫生组织欧洲区域的 KM,特别是在东欧和中亚地区。在这些努力中,更新一个涵盖整个区域的协调 KM 活动的总体战略将是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf91/10619313/c5db781b2e0e/12961_2023_1058_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf91/10619313/04a2ccbe2905/12961_2023_1058_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf91/10619313/c5db781b2e0e/12961_2023_1058_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf91/10619313/04a2ccbe2905/12961_2023_1058_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf91/10619313/c5db781b2e0e/12961_2023_1058_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review.知识管理工具和机制在世界卫生组织欧洲区域循证决策中的应用:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Oct 31;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01058-7.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.证据总结能否增加卫生政策制定者对系统评价证据的使用?一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;14(1):1-52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.8. eCollection 2018.
5
Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol.让政策制定者、医疗保健管理者和政策分析师参与知识综合的障碍、促进因素、策略及成果:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 23;6(12):e013929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013929.
6
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Evaluation of the performance and achievements of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe.对世界卫生组织循证政策网络(欧洲)的绩效和成果进行评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Sep 24;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00612-x.
8
Colorectal cancer prevention in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries: a review of policy approaches.中、东欧和南高加索国家的结直肠癌预防:政策方法综述。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 May 28;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2023-0030.
9
Strengthening national decision-making on immunization by building capacity for economic evaluation: Implementing ProVac in Europe.通过建设经济评估能力加强国家免疫决策:在欧洲实施ProVac项目
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.073.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Metrics for Measles Response Optimization in the United States: Considerations for Public Health Research, Policy, and Practice.美国麻疹应对优化的绩效指标:公共卫生研究、政策与实践的考量
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jul 5:333549251322667. doi: 10.1177/00333549251322667.
2
Knowledge attributes of public health management information systems used in health emergencies: a scoping review.卫生应急中使用的公共卫生管理信息系统的知识属性:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;12:1458867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1458867. eCollection 2024.
3
A Knowledge Management System for health emergencies: facilitating knowledge continuity and timely decision-making for frontline responders using experiential knowledge captured during action reviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of a new Digi-HTA process for digital health technologies in Finland.芬兰新数字健康技术 Digi-HTA 流程的实施。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Aug 19;38(1):e68. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000502.
2
An evaluation of the evidence brief for policy development process in WHO EVIPNet Europe countries.评估世卫组织 EVIPNet 欧洲国家政策制定过程中的证据摘要。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 May 7;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00852-z.
3
Strengthening the Interface of Evidence-Based Decision Making Across European Regulators and Health Technology Assessment Bodies.
一个用于卫生应急的知识管理系统:利用行动回顾期间获取的经验知识,促进知识的连续性并为一线应急人员提供及时决策支持。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;12:1427223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427223. eCollection 2024.
加强欧洲监管机构和卫生技术评估机构之间基于证据的决策的界面。
Value Health. 2022 Oct;25(10):1726-1735. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.026. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Implementation of coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices: A decision tool for late technology adopter countries.医疗器械证据开发计划覆盖的实施:晚期技术采用国的决策工具。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):195-206. doi: 10.1002/hec.4504. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Development and Pilot Test of the Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool: An Information Technology-Based Tool to Support and Review Registries.注册评估和质量标准工具的开发和试点测试:一种基于信息技术的工具,用于支持和审查注册。
Value Health. 2022 Aug;25(8):1390-1398. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.018. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
Relationship-building around a policy decision-support tool for urban health.围绕城市健康政策决策支持工具开展关系建设。
Build Cities. 2021;2(1):717-733. doi: 10.5334/bc.110. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
7
Evaluation of a knowledge translation strategy to improve policymaking and practices in health promotion and disease prevention setting in French regions: TC-REG, a realist study.评价一项知识转化策略,以改善法国地区健康促进和疾病预防领域的决策和实践:TC-REG,一项实际研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e045936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045936.
8
[Expert committees in German public health policymaking during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a document analysis].[新冠疫情期间德国公共卫生政策制定中的专家委员会:文献分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Oct;165:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Recommendations to plan a national burden of disease study.关于规划全国疾病负担研究的建议。
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;79(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00652-x.
10
Tuberculosis national registries and data on diagnosis delay - Is there room for improvement?结核病国家登记处和诊断延迟数据 - 是否有改进的空间?
Pulmonology. 2024 Mar-Apr;30(2):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jun 22.