• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种在危机事件中检测需求并确定其优先级的实证方法。

An Empirical Methodology for Detecting and Prioritizing Needs during Crisis Events.

作者信息

Sarol M Janina, Dinh Ly, Rezapour Rezvaneh, Chin Chieh-Li, Yang Pingjing, Diesner Jana

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.

出版信息

Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2020 Nov;2020:4102-4107. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.366.

DOI:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.366
PMID:37908863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10616930/
Abstract

In times of crisis, identifying essential needs is crucial to providing appropriate resources and services to affected entities. Social media platforms such as Twitter contain a vast amount of information about the general public's needs. However, the sparsity of information and the amount of noisy content present a challenge for practitioners to effectively identify relevant information on these platforms. This study proposes two novel methods for two needs detection tasks: 1) extracting a list of needed resources, such as masks and ventilators, and 2) detecting sentences that specify who-needs-what resources (e.g., we need testing). We evaluate our methods on a set of tweets about the COVID-19 crisis. For extracting a list of needs, we compare our results against two official lists of resources, achieving 0.64 precision. For detecting who-needs-what sentences, we compared our results against a set of 1,000 annotated tweets and achieved a 0.68 F1-score.

摘要

在危机时期,确定基本需求对于向受影响的实体提供适当的资源和服务至关重要。诸如推特这样的社交媒体平台包含了大量有关公众需求的信息。然而,信息的稀疏性和大量嘈杂的内容给从业者在这些平台上有效识别相关信息带来了挑战。本研究针对两项需求检测任务提出了两种新颖的方法:1)提取所需资源列表,如口罩和呼吸机,以及2)检测指定谁需要什么资源的句子(例如,我们需要检测)。我们在一组关于新冠疫情危机的推文上评估我们的方法。对于提取需求列表,我们将结果与两份官方资源列表进行比较,精确率达到0.64。对于检测谁需要什么的句子,我们将结果与一组1000条带注释的推文进行比较,F1分数达到0.68。

相似文献

1
An Empirical Methodology for Detecting and Prioritizing Needs during Crisis Events.一种在危机事件中检测需求并确定其优先级的实证方法。
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2020 Nov;2020:4102-4107. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.366.
2
Information sharing practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study about face masks.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的信息共享实践:以口罩为例的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0268043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268043. eCollection 2022.
3
The Saudi Ministry of Health's Twitter Communication Strategies and Public Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis Study.沙特卫生部在 COVID-19 大流行期间的 Twitter 传播策略和公众参与:内容分析研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 12;7(7):e27942. doi: 10.2196/27942.
4
The Spread of COVID-19 Crisis Communication by German Public Authorities and Experts on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis.德国公共当局和专家在 Twitter 上传播 COVID-19 危机信息:定量内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 22;7(12):e31834. doi: 10.2196/31834.
5
ReportAGE: Automatically extracting the exact age of Twitter users based on self-reports in tweets.ReportAGE:基于用户在推文中的自我报告自动提取 Twitter 用户的准确年龄。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):e0262087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262087. eCollection 2022.
6
Toward Using Twitter for Tracking COVID-19: A Natural Language Processing Pipeline and Exploratory Data Set.用于追踪 COVID-19 的 Twitter:自然语言处理管道和探索性数据集。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(1):e25314. doi: 10.2196/25314.
7
The Information Sharing Behaviors of Dietitians and Twitter Users in the Nutrition and COVID-19 Infodemic: Content Analysis Study of Tweets.营养师与推特用户在营养与新冠疫情信息疫情中的信息共享行为:推文内容分析研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Sep 16;2(2):e38573. doi: 10.2196/38573. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
8
Cross-Platform Comparative Study of Public Concern on Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Based on Twitter and Weibo.社交媒体平台在新冠疫情期间公众关注度的跨平台比较研究:基于 Twitter 和微博的实证研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;18(12):6487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126487.
9
A natural language processing pipeline to advance the use of Twitter data for digital epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes.一种自然语言处理流程,以促进将推特数据用于不良妊娠结局的数字流行病学研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2020;112S:100076. doi: 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2020.100076. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Identifying public concerns and reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: A text-mining analysis.在 COVID-19 大流行期间通过 Twitter 识别公众关注和反应:一项文本挖掘分析。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Mar;38(2):145-151. doi: 10.1111/phn.12843. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus, Ageism, and Twitter: An Evaluation of Tweets about Older Adults and COVID-19.冠状病毒、年龄歧视和推特:关于老年人和 COVID-19 的推文评估。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1661-1665. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16508. Epub 2020 May 9.
2
The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.推特疫情:推特在新冠疫情期间医学信息与错误信息传播中的关键作用
CJEM. 2020 Jul;22(4):418-421. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.361.
3
Automated Phrase Mining from Massive Text Corpora.从海量文本语料库中进行自动短语挖掘
IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2018 Oct;30(10):1825-1837. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2812203. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
4
SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH. Crisis informatics--New data for extraordinary times.社交媒体研究。危机信息学——非常时期的新数据。
Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):224-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2579.