Lalani Mirza, Sugavanam Priya, Caiels James, Crocker Helen, Gunn Sarah, Hay Harriet, Hogan Helen, Page Bethan, Peters Michele, Fitzpatrick Ray
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Apr;29(2):122-131. doi: 10.1177/13558196231209940. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
In 2022, England embarked on an ambitious reorganisation to produce an integrated health and care system, intended also to maximise population health. The newly created integrated care systems (ICSs) aim to improve quality of care, by achieving the best outcomes for individuals and populations through the provision of evidence-based services. An emerging approach for managing quality in organisations is the Quality Management System (QMS) framework. Using the framework, this study assessed how ICSs are managing and improving quality.
Four ICSs were purposively sampled, with the data collected between November 2021 and May 2022. Semi-structured interviews with system leaders (=60) from health and social care, public health and local representatives were held. We also observed key ICS meetings and reviewed relevant documents. A thematic framework approach based on the QMS framework was used to analyse the data.
The ICSs placed an emphasis on population health, reducing inequity and improving access. This represents a shift in focus from the traditional clinical approach to quality. There were tensions between quality assurance and improvement, with concerns that a narrow focus on assurance would impede ICSs from addressing broader quality issues, such as tackling inequalities and unwarranted variation in care and outcomes. Partnerships, a key enabler for integration, was seen as integral to achieving improvements in quality. Overall, the ICSs expressed concerns that any progress made in quality development and in improving population health would be tempered by unprecedented system pressures.
It is unclear whether ICSs can achieve their ambition. As they move away from an assurance-dominated model of quality to one that emphasises openness, learning and improvement, they must simultaneously build the digital infrastructure, staff expertise and culture to support such a shift.
2022年,英格兰着手进行一项雄心勃勃的重组,以建立一个综合的卫生与社会保健系统,其目标还包括使人口健康最大化。新创建的综合护理系统(ICS)旨在通过提供循证服务为个人和人群实现最佳结果,从而提高护理质量。质量管理体系(QMS)框架是组织中管理质量的一种新兴方法。本研究运用该框架评估了ICS如何管理和提高质量。
有目的地抽取了四个ICS,数据收集于2021年11月至2022年5月期间。对来自卫生与社会保健、公共卫生及地方代表的系统负责人(共60人)进行了半结构化访谈。我们还观察了ICS的关键会议并查阅了相关文件。采用基于QMS框架的主题框架法对数据进行分析。
ICS强调人群健康、减少不平等现象并改善可及性。这代表着从传统的质量临床方法向一种转变。质量保证与改进之间存在矛盾,有人担心过于狭隘地关注保证会阻碍ICS解决更广泛的质量问题,比如解决护理和结果方面的不平等及不必要的差异。伙伴关系作为整合的关键推动因素,被视为实现质量提升不可或缺的要素。总体而言,ICS担心质量发展及改善人群健康方面所取得的任何进展都会受到前所未有的系统压力的影响。
尚不清楚ICS能否实现其目标。在它们从以保证为主导的质量模式转向强调开放、学习与改进的模式时,必须同时构建数字基础设施、员工专业知识和文化来支持这一转变。