Knight Lisa, Neiva Ganga Rafaela, Tucker Matthew
Liverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2024 Feb 13;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-12-2023-0092.
Given the complex nature of integrated care systems (ICSs), the geographical spread and the large number of organisations involved in partnership delivery, the importance of leadership cannot be overstated. This paper aims to present novel findings from a rapid realist review of ICS leadership in England. The overall review question was: how does leadership in ICSs work, for whom and in what circumstances?
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Development of initial programme theories and associated context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) were supported by the theory-gleaning activities of a review of ICS strategies and guidance documents, a scoping review of the literature and interviews with key informants. A refined programme theory was then developed by testing these CMOCs against empirical data published in academic literature. Following screening and testing, six CMOCs were extracted from 18 documents. The study design, conduct and reporting were informed by the Realist And Metanarrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) training materials (Wong , 2013).
The review informed four programme theories explaining that leadership in ICSs works when ICS leaders hold themselves and others to account for improving population health, a sense of purpose is fostered through a clear vision, partners across the system are engaged in problem ownership and relationships are built at all levels of the system.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Despite being a rigorous and comprehensive investigation, stakeholder input was limited to one ICS, potentially restricting insights from varied geographical contexts. In addition, the recent establishment of ICSs meant limited literature availability, with few empirical studies conducted. Although this emphasises the importance and originality of the research, this scarcity posed challenges in extracting and applying certain programme theory elements, particularly context.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This review will be of relevance to academics and health-care leaders within ICSs in England, offering critical insights into ICS leadership, integrating diverse evidence to develop new evidence-based recommendations, filling a gap in the current literature and informing leadership practice and health-care systems.
鉴于综合医疗系统(ICSs)的复杂性、地域分布以及参与合作提供服务的大量组织,领导力的重要性再怎么强调也不为过。本文旨在呈现对英格兰ICS领导力进行快速现实主义综述的新发现。总体综述问题是:ICS中的领导力如何发挥作用、为谁发挥作用以及在何种情况下发挥作用?
设计/方法/途径:对ICS战略和指导文件的回顾、文献的范围综述以及对关键信息提供者的访谈等理论收集活动,为初始项目理论及相关的背景 - 机制 - 结果配置(CMOCs)的发展提供了支持。然后,通过将这些CMOCs与学术文献中发表的实证数据进行对比,形成了一个完善的项目理论。经过筛选和测试,从18份文件中提取了6个CMOCs。本研究的设计、实施和报告参考了现实主义与元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)培训材料(Wong,2013)。
该综述得出了四个项目理论,解释了在以下情况下ICS中的领导力能够发挥作用:ICS领导者要求自己和他人对改善人群健康负责;通过清晰的愿景培养使命感;系统内的合作伙伴共同承担问题;在系统的各个层面建立关系。
研究局限性/影响:尽管这是一项严谨且全面的调查,但利益相关者的参与仅限于一个ICS,这可能限制了来自不同地理背景的见解。此外,ICS的近期设立意味着文献资料有限,实证研究很少。虽然这突出了研究的重要性和原创性,但这种稀缺性在提取和应用某些项目理论要素(特别是背景要素)时带来了挑战。
原创性/价值:本综述对英格兰ICS内的学者和医疗保健领导者具有相关性,为ICS领导力提供了批判性见解,整合了不同证据以制定新的循证建议,填补了当前文献中的空白,并为领导力实践和医疗保健系统提供了参考。