Dr. Appel is Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Education, Director of Ethics Education in Psychiatry, and Assistant Director, Academy for Medicine & the Humanities, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2023 Dec 8;51(4):506-519. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.230043-23.
The adoption of the widely used four specific skills model of decisional capacity assessment, first proposed by Appelbaum and Grisso in 1988, has become widely accepted in clinical practice. Many jurisdictions have, through legislative action, incorporated one or more of these skills into state law as part of the legal definition of decisional capacity. These statutes pose a challenge for physicians hoping to revise these criteria, as some commentators have recently proposed. This article categorizes and analyzes existing state statutes that define decisional capacity or designate certain classes of individuals to render such assessments. Many of these statutes incorporate aspects of the four skills model into state law, such that legislative action would be required to affect significant changes in methods of capacity assessment. As a result, physicians in many jurisdictions are unable to modify these criteria on their own. Any effort to alter capacity assessment standards will have to take into account the potential challenges to enacting statutory change at the outset of such efforts.
广泛采用 Appelbaum 和 Grisso 于 1988 年首次提出的决策能力评估四项具体技能模型已在临床实践中得到广泛认可。许多司法管辖区通过立法行动,将这些技能中的一项或多项纳入州法律,作为决策能力法律定义的一部分。正如最近一些评论员所提出的那样,这些法规给希望修改这些标准的医生带来了挑战。本文对定义决策能力或指定某些类别的人进行此类评估的现有州法规进行分类和分析。其中许多法规将四项技能模型的各个方面纳入州法律,因此需要立法行动才能对能力评估方法进行重大更改。因此,许多司法管辖区的医生无法自行修改这些标准。任何改变能力评估标准的努力都必须考虑到在这些努力开始时对制定法定变更所带来的潜在挑战。