Suppr超能文献

高效空气颗粒过滤器预防野火相关哮喘并发症的成本效益研究。

High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filters for Preventing Wildfire-related Asthma Complications: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

机构信息

Climate Change Health Effects, Adaptation, and ResiLience Research Cluster.

Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, and.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 15;209(2):175-184. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202307-1205OC.

Abstract

Air pollution caused by wildfire smoke is linked to adverse health outcomes, especially for people living with asthma. To evaluate whether government rebates for high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, which reduce concentrations of smoke particles indoors, are cost effective in managing asthma and preventing exacerbations in British Columbia (BC), Canada. We used a Markov model to analyze health states for asthma control, exacerbation severity, and death over a retrospective time horizon of 5 years (2018-2022). Concentrations of wildfire smoke-derived particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ⩽2.5 μm (PM) from the Canadian Optimized Statistical Smoke Exposure Model and relevant literature informed the model. The base-case analysis assumed continuous use of a HEPA filter. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) resulting from varying rebates were computed for each Health Service Delivery Area (HSDA). In the base-case analysis, HEPA filter use resulted in increased costs of $83.34 (SE, $1.03) and increased QALYs of 0.0011 (SE, 0.0001) per person. The average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio among BC HSDAs was $74,652/QALY (SE, $3,517), with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $40,509 to $89,206 per QALY in HSDAs. Across the province, the intervention was projected to prevent 4,418 exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, 643 emergency department visits, and 425 hospitalizations during the 5-year time horizon. A full rebate was cost effective in 1 of the 16 HSDAs across BC. The probability of cost-effectiveness ranged from 0.1% to 74.8% across HSDAs. A $100 rebate was cost effective in most HSDAs. The cost-effectiveness of HEPA filters in managing wildfire smoke-related asthma issues in BC varies by region. Government rebates up to two-thirds of the filter cost are generally cost effective, with a full rebate being cost effective only in Kootenay Boundary.

摘要

野火烟雾造成的空气污染与不良健康后果有关,尤其是对患有哮喘的人。为了评估加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)政府为高效微粒空气(HEPA)过滤器提供的回扣是否具有成本效益,这些过滤器可减少室内烟雾颗粒的浓度,以管理哮喘并预防哮喘恶化。我们使用马尔可夫模型来分析哮喘控制、恶化严重程度和 5 年(2018-2022 年)回溯时间内的死亡健康状况。加拿大优化统计烟雾暴露模型和相关文献中得出的与野火烟雾衍生的直径 ⩽2.5 μm(PM)的颗粒物浓度为模型提供了信息。基础案例分析假设连续使用 HEPA 过滤器。为每个卫生服务提供区域(HSDA)计算了不同回扣的成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。在基础案例分析中,使用 HEPA 过滤器会导致每人增加 83.34 美元(SE,1.03 美元)的成本和增加 0.0011(SE,0.0001)的 QALY。BC HSDAs 的平均增量成本效益比为 74652 美元/QALY(SE,3517 美元),HSDAs 中的增量成本效益比范围为 40509 美元至 89206 美元/QALY。在全省范围内,预计该干预措施将在 5 年时间内预防需要全身皮质类固醇的 4418 次恶化、643 次急诊就诊和 425 次住院治疗。在 BC 的 16 个 HSDAs 中,有 1 个地区的全额回扣是具有成本效益的。在 HSDAs 中,成本效益的概率范围从 0.1%到 74.8%不等。100 美元的回扣在大多数 HSDAs 中都是具有成本效益的。BC 管理野火烟雾相关哮喘问题的 HEPA 过滤器的成本效益因地区而异。高达三分之二的过滤器成本的政府回扣通常具有成本效益,只有在库特尼边界地区才具有全额回扣的成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验