Njuguna Irene, Mugo Cyrus, Mbwayo Anne, Augusto Orvalho, Wamalwa Dalton, Inwani Irene
Kenyatta National Hospital, Research and Programs, P.O. Box 20723-00202, Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98104.
Kenyatta National Hospital, Research and Programs, P.O. Box 20723-00202, Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98104.
J Sch Health. 2024 Feb;94(2):178-183. doi: 10.1111/josh.13403. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
With optimized antiretroviral treatment youth living with HIV (YLH) now spend most of their time in schools, making schools an important venue to optimize outcomes. We evaluated school support for YLH.
We conducted surveys with public secondary/high schools in 3 Kenyan counties (Nairobi, Homa Bay, and Kajiado) to determine policies and training related to HIV. Chi-squared tests and Poisson regression were used to compare policy availability and staff training by county HIV prevalence and school type.
Of 512 schools in the 3 counties, we surveyed 100. The majority (60%) of schools surveyed had boarding facilities. The median student population was 406 (IQR: 200, 775). Only half (49%) of schools had medication use policies; more in boarding than day schools (65% vs 30%, p = .003). While most schools (82%) had clinic attendance policies; policy availability was higher in higher HIV prevalence counties (Homa Bay [100%], Nairobi [82%], Kajiado [56%], p < .05). Overall, 64% had confidentiality policies with higher policy availability in higher HIV prevalence regions (p < .05). Few schools had staff trained in HIV-related topics: HIV prevention (37%), HIV treatment (18%), HIV stigma reduction (36%). Few were trained in confidentiality (41%), psychosocial support (40%), or mental health (26%). Compared to day schools, boarding school were more likely to have staff trained in HIV prevention (prevalence ratio: 2.1 [95% confidence interval 1.0, 4.0], p = .037).
In this survey of Kenyan schools, there were notable gaps in HIV care policy availability and training, despite high HIV burden. Development and implementation of national school HIV policies and staff training as well as strengthening clinic and family support may improve outcomes for YLH.
随着抗逆转录病毒治疗的优化,感染艾滋病毒的青少年(YLH)现在大部分时间都在学校,这使得学校成为优化治疗效果的重要场所。我们评估了学校对YLH的支持情况。
我们对肯尼亚3个县(内罗毕、霍马湾和卡贾多)的公立中学进行了调查,以确定与艾滋病毒相关的政策和培训情况。采用卡方检验和泊松回归,按县艾滋病毒流行率和学校类型比较政策的可获得性和工作人员培训情况。
在这3个县的512所学校中,我们调查了100所。接受调查的学校中,大多数(60%)有寄宿设施。学生人数中位数为406人(四分位间距:200,775)。只有一半(49%)的学校有用药政策;寄宿学校的比例高于日制学校(65%对30%,p = 0.003)。虽然大多数学校(82%)有就诊政策;艾滋病毒流行率较高的县政策可获得性更高(霍马湾[100%]、内罗毕[82%]、卡贾多[56%],p < 0.05)。总体而言,64%的学校有保密政策,艾滋病毒流行率较高地区的政策可获得性更高(p < 0.05)。很少有学校的工作人员接受过与艾滋病毒相关主题的培训:艾滋病毒预防(37%)、艾滋病毒治疗(18%)、减少艾滋病毒污名化(36%)。接受保密(41%)、心理社会支持(40%)或心理健康(26%)培训的人很少。与日制学校相比,寄宿学校的工作人员更有可能接受艾滋病毒预防培训(流行率比值:2.1[95%置信区间1.0,4.0],p = 0.037)。
在这项对肯尼亚学校的调查中,尽管艾滋病毒负担沉重,但在艾滋病毒护理政策的可获得性和培训方面仍存在明显差距。制定和实施国家学校艾滋病毒政策及工作人员培训,以及加强诊所和家庭支持,可能会改善YLH的治疗效果。