Comparison of dolutegravir+Lamivudine and bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients infected with HIV: preliminary results from clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of dolutegravir+lamivudine (DTG +3TC) and bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) have been demonstrated in clinical trials of treatment-naïve therapy. However, real-life data are lacking. We investigated and compared the virological outcomes and safety of DTG + 3TC with BIC/FTC/TAF in an adult cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of PLWH who were naïve to antiretroviral therapy and initiated the antiretroviral regimen of DTG + 3TC or BIC/FTC/TAF from January 2020 to March 2022. Treatment effectiveness, defined as the capability of treatment to achieve viral suppression (viral load < 50 copies/mL), was analyzed. Changes in immunology, metabolism, liver and renal function after 48 weeks of treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 48 weeks, both groups showed high viral suppression, with 82.4% (108/131) and 89% (129/145) of the patients in the BIC/FTC/TAF and DTG + 3TC groups, respectively, having viral suppression (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.29-1.15,  = 0.3). No differences existed in immunology, metabolism, liver and renal function; however, BIC/FTC/TAF led to greater weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Both optimization strategies showed high tolerability in antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients, with no differences in virological efficacy; however, BIC/FTC/TAF may be related to the risk of weight gain risk. Further research is required to evaluate this problem.