University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Apr;80(4):1464-1472. doi: 10.1111/jan.15932. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
There have been recurring UK initiatives to increase nurse research capability but little robust evaluation of long-term effectiveness. More nurses undertake doctorates, yet few lead major funded projects. Previous research suggests potential explanations but the perspectives of nurse lead-investigators themselves have not been examined.
To explore the perceptions of nurse lead-investigators about what has helped or hindered them to lead funded research projects.
Lead investigators of research projects from major UK funders (1 Apr 2017-Sept 2022) were identified from publicly available data. University profiles were screened to identify registered nurses. Entire population was approached (no sample size calculation required). Consenting participants completed an online survey (five open questions).
A total of 65 nurse-lead investigators were identified, 36 (55%) completed the survey (20 December 2022 to 17 February 2023). Participants identified Building (multi-disciplinary) collaborations and mentorship as having been most important to their success. High-quality mentoring was also identified as most important in helping novice nurse researchers become leaders. Participants highlighted the critical importance of being supported by individuals with a track record of funding success and benefits of being situated in research-supportive environments. Lack of career pathway/infrastructure and being unable to pursue research due to competing clinical/teaching priorities were identified as most unhelpful to this group AND the most common reasons for peers not going on to lead research.
Ensuring access to mentors with an established track record is an important component of schemes to increase research capability in nurses. Funded, protected time for research and career structures that reward the significant skill development required to succeed in a competitive, multi-disciplinary funding arena is important.
Interdisciplinary collaboration and mentorship by experienced researchers are critical to success and should be incorporated into future interventions to increase research capability in nurses. No patient or public contribution (as exploring a professional issue).
英国曾多次发起提高护士研究能力的举措,但对长期效果的严格评估却很少。尽管有更多的护士攻读博士学位,但很少有人领导重大资助项目。之前的研究提出了一些潜在的解释,但没有研究过护士领衔研究者自己的观点。
探讨领衔研究者对有助于或阻碍其领导资助研究项目的因素的看法。
从主要英国资助者(2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月)的公开数据中确定研究项目的领衔研究者。筛选大学简介以确定注册护士。对整个人群进行调查(无需计算样本量)。同意参与的参与者完成了在线调查(五个开放式问题)。
共确定了 65 名护士领衔研究者,其中 36 名(55%)完成了调查(2022 年 12 月 20 日至 2023 年 2 月 17 日)。参与者认为建立(多学科)合作和指导关系对他们的成功最为重要。高质量的指导也被认为对帮助新手护士研究人员成为领导者最为重要。参与者强调,得到有成功资助记录的个人的支持以及身处支持研究的环境的重要性。缺乏职业发展途径/基础设施以及由于临床/教学优先事项的竞争而无法从事研究被认为对该群体最没有帮助,也是同行不继续领导研究的最常见原因。
确保获得有成熟经验的导师的指导是提高护士研究能力计划的重要组成部分。为研究提供有资金保障的、受保护的时间以及为在竞争激烈的多学科资助环境中取得成功所需的重要技能发展提供回报的职业结构非常重要。
经验丰富的研究人员的跨学科合作和指导对成功至关重要,应将其纳入未来提高护士研究能力的干预措施中。没有患者或公众的贡献(因为正在探讨一个专业问题)。