Suppr超能文献

多重耐药/广泛耐药/全耐药还是 DTR?铜绿假单胞菌的耐药谱符合哪种定义?

MDR/XDR/PDR or DTR? Which definition best fits the resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa?

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna.

Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 1;36(6):564-571. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000966. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this narrative review is to compare the prognostic utility of the new definition of difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) vs. established definitions in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection to understand the therapeutic implications of resistance classification and its impact on clinical outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), P. aeruginosa (PA) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, mostly related to its intrinsic capacity of developing antibiotic resistance. Several classifications of antibiotic resistance have been proposed in the last 15 years. The most common used is that from Magiorakos et al. including multidrug resistance (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pan drug resistance (PDR) according to the number of antibiotic classes showing in vitro activity. A further classification based on the resistance to specific antibiotic classes (i.e. fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, carbapenem resistance) was also proposed. However, both of them have been criticized because of limited usefulness in clinical practice and for poor correlation with patient outcome, mainly in infections due to PA. More recently the new definition of difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) has been proposed referring to nonsusceptibility to all first-line agents showing high-efficacy and low-toxicity (i.e. carbapenems, β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and fluoroquinolones). Studies including large cohorts of patients with GNB bloodstream infections have confirmed the prognostic value of DTR classification and its clinical usefulness mainly in infections due to PA. Indeed, in the recent documents from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) on the management of antibiotic resistant GNB infections, the DTR classification was applied to PA.

SUMMARY

DTR definition seems to identify better than MDR/XDR/PDR and single class resistant categories the cases of PA with limited treatment options. It requires periodic revision in order to remain up-to-date with the introduction of new antibiotics and the evolving pattern of resistance.

摘要

目的综述

本综述的目的是比较新的难治性耐药(DTR)定义与铜绿假单胞菌感染患者中已建立的定义在预测预后方面的差异,以了解耐药分类的治疗意义及其对临床结局的影响。

最近的发现

在革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)中,铜绿假单胞菌(PA)与高发病率和死亡率相关,主要与它内在的产生抗生素耐药的能力有关。在过去的 15 年中,已经提出了几种抗生素耐药分类。最常用的是 Magiorakos 等人提出的分类,根据体外药敏试验中显示的抗生素种类数,将耐药分为多重耐药(MDR)、广泛耐药(XDR)和全耐药(PDR)。另一种基于对特定抗生素类别(即氟喹诺酮类、头孢菌素类、碳青霉烯类耐药)的耐药性的分类也被提出。然而,这两种分类都受到了批评,因为它们在临床实践中的实用性有限,并且与患者结局的相关性较差,主要是在 PA 引起的感染中。最近,提出了新的难治性耐药(DTR)定义,指对所有一线药物均不敏感,这些药物具有高效低毒的特点(即碳青霉烯类、β-内酰胺类-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂合剂和氟喹诺酮类)。包括大量 GNB 血流感染患者的研究证实了 DTR 分类的预后价值及其在 PA 感染中的临床实用性。事实上,在美国传染病学会(IDSA)最近关于抗生素耐药 GNB 感染管理的文件中,DTR 分类被应用于 PA。

总结

DTR 定义似乎比 MDR/XDR/PDR 和单类耐药分类更能识别出 PA 感染中治疗选择有限的病例。为了与新抗生素的引入和耐药模式的演变保持同步,需要定期修订。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验