Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Feb;37(1):107-118. doi: 10.1177/19714009231207083. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
200 kHz tumor treating fields (TTFields) is clinically approved for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). Because its effects on conventional surveillance MRI brain scans are equivocal, we investigated its effects on perfusion MRI (pMRI) brain scans.
Each patient underwent institutional standard pMRI: dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) pMRI at three time points: baseline, 2-, and 6-months on-adjuvant therapy. At each timepoint, the difference between T1 pre- versus post-contrast tumor volume (ΔT1) and these pMRI metrics were evaluated: normalized and standardized relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV, sRCBV); fractional plasma volume (V), volume of extravascular extracellular space (EES) per volume of tissue (V), blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability (K), and time constant for gadolinium reflux from EES back into the vascular system (K). Between-group comparisons were performed using rank-sum analysis, and bootstrapping evaluated likely reproducibility of the results.
Among 13 pMRI datasets (11 nGBM, 2 recurrent GBM), therapies included temozolomide-only ( = 9) and temozolomide + TTFields ( = 4). No significant differences were found in patient or tumor characteristics. Compared to temozolomide-only, temozolomide + TTFields did not significantly affect the percent-change in pMRI metrics from baseline to 2 months. But during the 2- to 6-month period, temozolomide + TTFields significantly increased the percent-change in nRCBV (+26.9% [interquartile range 55.1%] vs -39.1% [37.0%], = 0.049), sRCBV (+9.5% [39.7%] vs -30.5% [39.4%], = 0.049), K (+54.6% [1768.4%] vs -26.9% [61.2%], = 0.024), V (+111.0% [518.1%] vs -13.0% [22.5%], = 0.048), and V (+98.8% [2172.4%] vs -24.6% [53.3%], = 0.024) compared to temozolomide-only.
Using pMRI, we provide initial in-human validation of pre-clinical studies regarding the effects of TTFields on tumor blood volume and BBB permeability in GBM.
200kHz 肿瘤治疗电场(TTFields)已获批用于新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤(nGBM)。由于其对常规监测磁共振成像(MRI)脑扫描的影响尚不确定,我们对此进行了研究。
每位患者均接受机构标准的灌注 MRI(pMRI)检查:在辅助治疗的 3 个时间点进行动态对比增强(DCE)和动态磁化率对比(DSC)pMRI:基线、2 个月和 6 个月。在每个时间点,评估 T1 对比前后肿瘤体积(ΔT1)与以下 pMRI 指标的差异:标准化相对脑血容量(nRCBV、sRCBV);分体积(V)、组织中细胞外血管外空间(EES)体积(V)、血脑屏障(BBB)通透性(K)和 EES 内的钆回流至血管系统的时间常数(K)。使用秩和检验进行组间比较,Bootstrap 评估结果的重现性。
在 13 个 pMRI 数据集(11 个 nGBM,2 个复发性 GBM)中,治疗方法包括替莫唑胺单药治疗(n=9)和替莫唑胺联合 TTFields 治疗(n=4)。患者和肿瘤特征无显著差异。与替莫唑胺单药治疗相比,替莫唑胺联合 TTFields 治疗在 2 个月至 6 个月期间,pMRI 指标的变化百分比无显著差异。但是在 2 至 6 个月期间,替莫唑胺联合 TTFields 治疗使 nRCBV(+26.9%[55.1%] vs -39.1%[37.0%], = 0.049)、sRCBV(+9.5%[39.7%] vs -30.5%[39.4%], = 0.049)、K(+54.6%[1768.4%] vs -26.9%[61.2%], = 0.024)、V(+111.0%[518.1%] vs -13.0%[22.5%], = 0.048)和 V(+98.8%[2172.4%] vs -24.6%[53.3%], = 0.024)的变化百分比显著增加,与替莫唑胺单药治疗相比。
使用 pMRI,我们提供了 TTFields 对 GBM 肿瘤血容量和 BBB 通透性影响的临床前研究的初步验证。