• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线和中期 [18F]FDG-PET/MRI 用于评估接受根治性治疗的 M0 食管鳞癌患者的治疗反应和生存情况。

Baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI to assess treatment response and survival in patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by curative-intent therapy.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linko, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 333423, Taiwan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 333423, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Imaging. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00630-2.

DOI:10.1186/s40644-023-00630-2
PMID:37932848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10629192/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the value of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI in predicting treatment response and survival in patients with primary M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma received [18F]FDG-PET/MRI at baseline and during neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy. The treatment response was classified according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors 1.1. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess the association between PET/MRI parameters and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

We included 40 M0 patients in the final analysis. The volume transfer constant (K) from baseline PET/MRI (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.688, P = 0.034) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from baseline PET/MRI (AUC = 0.723, P = 0.006) or interim PET/MRI (AUC = 0.853, P < 0.001) showed acceptable AUC for predicting treatment response. The TLG from interim PET/MRI (interim TLG, P < 0.001) and extracellular volume fraction (Ve) on interim PET/MRI (interim Ve, P = 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. Baseline Ve (P = 0.044) and interim TLG (P = 0.004) were significant predictors of PFS. The c-indices of the prognostic models combining interim TLG with Ve for predicting OS, and baseline Ve and interim TLG for predicting PFS were 0.784 and 0.699, respectively. These values were significantly higher than the corresponding c-indices of the TNM staging system (P = 0.002 and P = 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI qualitative imaging parameters aids in predicting the prognosis of patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT05855291 and NCT05855278).

摘要

背景

探讨 [18F]FDG-PET/MRI 在预测原发性 M0 食管鳞癌患者治疗反应和生存中的价值。

方法

食管鳞癌患者在基线时和新辅助或根治性放化疗期间接受 [18F]FDG-PET/MRI。根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 对治疗反应进行分类。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析评估 PET/MRI 参数与总生存期(OS)或无进展生存期(PFS)之间的关系。

结果

最终纳入 40 例 M0 患者进行分析。基线 PET/MRI 的容积转移常数(K)(曲线下面积(AUC)=0.688,P=0.034)和基线 PET/MRI 的总病变糖酵解(TLG)(AUC=0.723,P=0.006)或中期 PET/MRI(AUC=0.853,P<0.001)的 TLG 对预测治疗反应具有可接受的 AUC。中期 PET/MRI 的 TLG(中期 TLG,P<0.001)和中期 PET/MRI 的细胞外容积分数(Ve)(中期 Ve,P=0.001)被确定为 OS 的独立预后因素。基线 Ve(P=0.044)和中期 TLG(P=0.004)是 PFS 的显著预测因素。结合中期 TLG 和 Ve 的预后模型预测 OS 的 C 指数为 0.784,结合基线 Ve 和中期 TLG 预测 PFS 的 C 指数为 0.699,均显著高于 TNM 分期系统的相应 C 指数(P=0.002 和 P=0.047)。

结论

结合基线和中期 [18F]FDG-PET/MRI 定性成像参数有助于预测 M0 食管鳞癌患者的预后。

试验注册

该研究在 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册(标识符:NCT05855291 和 NCT05855278)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df9/10629192/d7c5ab39e01b/40644_2023_630_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df9/10629192/7d66a09b7cfe/40644_2023_630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df9/10629192/d7c5ab39e01b/40644_2023_630_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df9/10629192/7d66a09b7cfe/40644_2023_630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df9/10629192/d7c5ab39e01b/40644_2023_630_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI to assess treatment response and survival in patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by curative-intent therapy.基线和中期 [18F]FDG-PET/MRI 用于评估接受根治性治疗的 M0 食管鳞癌患者的治疗反应和生存情况。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00630-2.
2
Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy for first-line treatment in individuals with Hodgkin lymphoma.正电子发射断层扫描适配疗法用于霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的一线治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 9;1(1):CD010533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010533.pub2.
3
Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy for first-line treatment in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma.正电子发射断层扫描适配疗法用于成人霍奇金淋巴瘤的一线治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 26;3(3):CD010533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010533.pub3.
4
Role of Metabolic Parameters of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) Imaging in Predicting Progression-Free Survival of Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Single-Center Study.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET-CT)成像的代谢参数在预测放射性碘难治性分化型甲状腺癌无进展生存期方面的作用:一项单中心研究
Cureus. 2025 May 28;17(5):e84998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84998. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.18F-FDG-PET/CT参数对胰腺癌患者的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007813.
6
Enhancing prognostication and treatment response evaluation in primary CNS lymphoma with 18F-FDG-PET/CT.利用18F-FDG-PET/CT增强原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的预后评估和治疗反应评估。
Neuro Oncol. 2024 Dec 5;26(12):2377-2387. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae146.
7
Pretreatment PET dissemination features as biomarkers for survival outcomes in melanoma patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.治疗前PET播散特征作为接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的黑色素瘤患者生存结局的生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95713-4.
8
Prognostic Impact of Quantitative Changes Between Baseline and Interim 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Pediatric Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma.基线与中期18F-FDG PET/CT定量变化对儿童经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤的预后影响
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Jul 1;50(7):e407-e416. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005874. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
9
Prognostic utility of serial F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent tri-modality treatment.三模态治疗后局部进展期直肠癌患者连续 F-FDG-PET/CT 的预后价值。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Jan;93(1105):20190455. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190455. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Tumor Asphericity in FDG PET Is an Independent Prognostic Parameter Improving Risk Stratification in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.FDG PET 中的肿瘤非球形度是改善头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者风险分层的独立预后参数。
J Nucl Med. 2025 May 1;66(5):686-691. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268972.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in predicting survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像在预测食管胃交界腺癌患者生存情况中的预后价值
Ann Nucl Med. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s12149-025-02058-z.
2
Staging of esophageal cancer using PET/MRI: a systematic review with head-to-head comparison.使用PET/MRI对食管癌进行分期:一项进行直接比较的系统评价
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01565-9.
3
The prognostic value of pretreatment [F]FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018.2018 年按组织学和部位划分的全球食管和胃癌负担。
Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1564-1571. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321600. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
Prognostic value of F-FDG PET/MR imaging biomarkers in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
食管癌治疗前[F]FDG PET/CT参数的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3396-3408. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11207-3. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像生物标志物在食管鳞状细胞癌中的预后价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Nov;120:108671. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108671. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Metabolic parameters of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT predict overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation.连续 18F-FDG PET/CT 的代谢参数可预测接受(放)化疗的食管癌患者的总生存。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Feb 19;14(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1236-x.
5
Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Trimodality Therapy for Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma: Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Literature.可切除食管癌的确定性放化疗与三联疗法:文献的Meta分析和系统评价
World J Surg. 2019 May;43(5):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04901-z.
6
Early response evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy with PET/MRI to predict resectability in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.使用 PET/MRI 对新辅助治疗进行早期反应评估,预测食管胃结合部腺癌患者的可切除性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Mar;44(3):836-844. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1841-4.
7
Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.全球癌症生存趋势监测 2000-14 年(CONCORD-3):对来自 71 个国家 322 个基于人群的登记处的 37513025 名诊断患有 18 种癌症之一的患者的个体记录进行分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1023-1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Changes in multimodality functional imaging parameters early during chemoradiation predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.放化疗早期多模态功能影像学参数变化可预测局部晚期头颈部癌症患者的治疗反应。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 May;45(5):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3890-2. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Interim F-FDG-PET/CT during chemo-radiotherapy in the management of oesophageal cancer patients. A systematic review.放化疗期间食管癌患者 F-FDG-PET/CT 检查的应用:一项系统评价。
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Nov;125(2):200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET for pathological response of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis.18F-FDG PET对食管癌患者新辅助放化疗期间或之后原发肿瘤病理反应的预测价值:一项荟萃分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;46(12):1118-1126. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw132. Epub 2016 Oct 4.