• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进健康公平:建立社区参与研究的创新计划。

Advancing Health Equity: An Innovative Program for Building Community Engagement in Research.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):523-533.

PMID:37934450
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Community Research Fellows (CRF) program seeks to mobilize New Haven residents with lower incomes or from communities of color who are educated and equipped to engage as equal partners in health research at Yale University. The training program combines curriculum-based information with 'on-the-ground' experience with Yale research projects, while building relationships between CRFs and researchers. The Community Alliance for Research and Engagement launched two consecutive cohorts of the program in 2018-2020.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of the CRF program on participants' knowledge of the research process and confidence to engage in research and participants' satisfaction and perspectives on the program.

METHODS

The evaluation of the CRF program included four components: 1) Pre- and Post- Program Surveys to assess change in confidence and self-reported knowledge. 2) Curriculum Feedback Satisfaction Survey to gauge satisfaction and make program improvements after each training session. 3) Post-Program CRF Interviews to explore their CRF experiences. 4) Research Team Surveys to assess program satisfaction and areas for improvement.

RESULTS

CRFs reported increased confidence and knowledge, personal and professional growth, and interest in community-engaged research. Overall, participants were very satisfied with each training module.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRF program demonstrated that community members are well-suited, well-positioned, and eager to engage in and inform public health research. CRFs bring capacity and valuable perspective to research teams. The CRF training program offers an innovative approach to address power imbalances in research and to move towards more equitable community-university partnerships for improved health outcomes.

摘要

背景

社区研究研究员(CRF)计划旨在动员收入较低或来自有色人种社区的纽黑文居民,这些居民受过教育并具备在耶鲁大学从事健康研究的能力,能够作为平等的合作伙伴参与其中。该培训计划将基于课程的信息与耶鲁研究项目的“实地”经验相结合,同时在 CRF 和研究人员之间建立关系。社区研究与参与联盟于 2018 年至 2020 年连续推出了两期该计划。

目的

评估 CRF 计划对参与者对研究过程的了解程度、参与研究的信心以及对该计划的满意度和看法的影响。

方法

对 CRF 计划的评估包括四个部分:1)计划前后调查,以评估信心和自我报告知识的变化。2)课程反馈满意度调查,以在每次培训后评估满意度并进行计划改进。3)计划后 CRF 访谈,以探讨他们的 CRF 经验。4)研究团队调查,以评估计划满意度和改进领域。

结果

CRF 报告称,他们的信心和知识有所提高,个人和专业成长,以及对社区参与式研究的兴趣。总体而言,参与者对每个培训模块都非常满意。

结论

CRF 计划表明,社区成员非常适合、有优势并且渴望参与并为公共卫生研究提供信息。CRF 为研究团队带来了能力和有价值的观点。CRF 培训计划为解决研究中的权力不平衡问题提供了一种创新方法,并为改善健康结果的更公平的社区-大学伙伴关系奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Advancing Health Equity: An Innovative Program for Building Community Engagement in Research.推进健康公平:建立社区参与研究的创新计划。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):523-533.
2
Communicating to Engage: An Improvisational Theater-Based Communication Training Designed to Support Community-Academic Partnership Development.沟通以参与:一种基于即兴戏剧的沟通培训,旨在支持社区学术伙伴关系的发展。
Acad Med. 2021 Nov 1;96(11):1564-1568. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004367.
3
Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-centered outcomes research training program for the cystic fibrosis community.针对囊性纤维化群体的虚拟以患者为中心的结局研究培训项目的开发与评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 4;7(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00328-4.
4
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
5
Increasing Community Research Capacity to Address Health Disparities.增强社区研究能力以解决健康差距问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Feb;12(1):55-66. doi: 10.1177/1556264616687639.
6
Implementation and Evaluation of a Dual-Track Research Training Program for Community Members and Community-Based Organizations.实施和评估面向社区成员和社区组织的双轨研究培训计划。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):75-87. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0010.
7
Partnership Among Peers: Lessons Learned From the Development of a Community Organization-Academic Research Training Program.同伴间的合作关系:从一个社区组织-学术研究培训项目的发展中汲取的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):461-470. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0052.
8
Enhancing Capacity of Community-Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy.增强社区-学术伙伴关系的能力以实现健康公平:基于 CBPR 伙伴关系学院的研究结果。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):552-563. doi: 10.1177/1524839918818830. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
9
Colorado Immersion Training in Community Engagement: Because You Can't Study What You Don't Know.科罗拉多社区参与沉浸式培训:因为你无法研究你所不了解的事物。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Spring;8(1):117-24. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0006.
10
The community engagement course and action network: strengthening community and academic research partnerships to advance health equity.社区参与课程和行动网络:加强社区和学术研究伙伴关系,推进健康公平。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;11:1114868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114868. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of cocreation in research engagement: a study protocol.研究参与中共同创造实用测量方法的开发与验证:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e091966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091966.