Suppr超能文献

在心理体验产生过程中对记忆痕迹的差异性获取。

Differential access to memory traces in the production of mental experience.

作者信息

Cicogna P, Cavallero C, Bosinelli M

出版信息

Int J Psychophysiol. 1986 Nov;4(3):209-16. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(86)90017-6.

Abstract

Two experiments were performed to determine the nature of the memory traces used in the production of mental experiences (dreams, daydreams). Free associations with dreams, collected upon experimental awakenings in Sleep Onset and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, were classified as strict episodes, abstract self-references, or semantic traces, adapting Tulving's model (Experiment 1). Results showed that associations with Sleep Onset dreams were mainly strict episodes while REM associations were evenly distributed: that represents a psychophysiological state-dependency of the access to memory traces. A comparison of free associations with dream, daydreams, and films (Experiment 2) showed a similarity between access to memory traces in daydreaming and Sleep Onset dreaming. Physiological condition was not a discriminating factor. This homogeneity suggests that cognitive processes involved in the creation of original narrative sequences may be similar in sleep and waking. These findings and their interpretation tend to support a unitary theory of the mind rather than dichotomous models which, in dream research, have often been misleading.

摘要

进行了两项实验,以确定用于产生心理体验(梦境、白日梦)的记忆痕迹的性质。根据图尔文的模型,在睡眠开始和快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段的实验性唤醒时收集的与梦境相关的自由联想,被分类为严格情节、抽象自我参照或语义痕迹(实验1)。结果表明,与睡眠开始阶段梦境的联想主要是严格情节,而与快速眼动睡眠阶段的联想分布均匀:这代表了获取记忆痕迹的心理生理状态依赖性。对与梦境、白日梦和电影的自由联想进行比较(实验2),结果显示白日梦和睡眠开始阶段梦境在获取记忆痕迹方面具有相似性。生理状况并非区分因素。这种同质性表明,在睡眠和清醒状态下,参与创建原始叙事序列的认知过程可能相似。这些发现及其解释倾向于支持一种统一的心智理论,而非二分模型,在梦境研究中,二分模型常常具有误导性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验