Bush Alex, Simpson Katherine Hannah, Hanley Nick
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Conserv Biol. 2024 Jun;38(3):e14216. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14216. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
Environmental markets are a rapidly emerging tool to mobilize private funding to incentivize landholders to undertake more sustainable land management. How units of biodiversity in these markets are measured and subsequently traded creates key challenges ecologically and economically because it determines whether environmental markets can deliver net gains in biodiversity and efficiently lower the costs of conservation. We developed and tested a metric for such markets based on the well-established principle of irreplaceability from systematic conservation planning. Irreplaceability as a metric avoids the limitations of like-for-like trading and allows one to capture the multidimensional nature of ecosystems (e.g., habitats, species, ecosystem functioning) and simultaneously achieve cost-effective, land-manager-led investments in conservation. Using an integrated ecological modeling approach, we tested whether using irreplaceability as a metric is more ecologically and economically beneficial than the simpler biodiversity offset metrics typically used in net gain and no-net-loss policies. Using irreplaceability ensured no net loss, or even net gain, of biodiversity depending on the targets chosen. Other metrics did not provide the same assurances and, depending on the flexibility with which biodiversity targets can be achieved, and how they overlap with development pressure, were less efficient. Irreplaceability reduced the costs of offsetting to developers and the costs of ecological restoration to society. Integrating economic data and systematic conservation planning approaches would therefore assure land managers they were being fairly rewarded for the opportunity costs of conservation and transparently incentivize the most ecologically and economically efficient investments in nature recovery.
环境市场是一种迅速兴起的工具,用于调动私人资金,激励土地所有者采取更具可持续性的土地管理方式。这些市场中生物多样性单位的测量及后续交易在生态和经济方面带来了关键挑战,因为这决定了环境市场能否实现生物多样性的净增益并有效降低保护成本。我们基于系统保护规划中已确立的不可替代性原则,开发并测试了一种适用于此类市场的指标。将不可替代性作为一种指标,避免了同类交易的局限性,能够体现生态系统的多维度特性(如栖息地、物种、生态系统功能),同时实现由土地管理者主导的具有成本效益的保护投资。我们采用综合生态建模方法,测试了使用不可替代性作为指标是否比净增益和无净损失政策中通常使用的更简单的生物多样性抵消指标在生态和经济方面更具优势。根据所选目标,使用不可替代性可确保生物多样性不出现净损失,甚至实现净增益。其他指标无法提供同样的保证,并且根据实现生物多样性目标的灵活性以及它们与发展压力的重叠程度,效率较低。不可替代性降低了开发商的抵消成本以及社会的生态恢复成本。因此,整合经济数据和系统保护规划方法将确保土地管理者因保护的机会成本而得到公平回报,并透明地激励对自然恢复进行最具生态和经济效益的投资。