Predictors of a Good Diuretic Response and Administration Methods for Carperitide in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

PURPOSE

In Japan, carperitide has been recommended for the treatment of pulmonary congestion in patients with acute heart failure. Identifying useful indicators to support the decision to administer carperitide and the optimal timing of administration may lead to better improvement of pulmonary congestion. Therefore, we investigated the factors associated with good diuretic response to carperitide in patients with acute heart failure and the optimal timing of carperitide administration.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated 293 hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with acute heart failure and treated with carperitide at the Department of Cardiology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital. The primary endpoint was the diuretic response to carperitide. Patients with urine output ≥100 mL/h were defined as the good diuretic response group, and those with a urine output <100 mL/h during the first 6 hours of carperitide administration were defined as the poor diuretic response group. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the predictors of good diuretic response. The relationship between the time from intravenous furosemide to carperitide administration and urine output was also investigated.

FINDINGS

The patients' median age was 77 (range: 28-99) years, and 75.5% had New York Heart Association stage IV acute heart failure. The median urine output within 6 hours of carperitide administration was 104.5 (range: 6.6-1571.3) mL/h, and 118 patients (53.6%) showed a good diuretic response. Significant predictors of good diuretic response were age < 75 years [odds ratio (OR) 4.186; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.129-8.230; P < 0.001], no prior use of loop diuretics (OR 2.155; 95% CI, 1.104-4.207; P = 0.024), blood urea nitrogen <20 mg/dL (OR 2.637; 95% CI, 1.340-5.190; P = 0.005), and white blood cell count <8.6 × 10/L (OR 3.162; 95% CI, 1.628-6.140; P = 0.001). The median urine output in the group with <2 hours between intravenous furosemide and carperitide administration was significantly higher than that in the group with an interval >6 hours [127.3; interquartile range (IQR), 77.6-216.2 mL/h vs. 66.2; IQR. 51.8-114.8 mL/h; P = 0.012).

IMPLICATIONS

The 4 predictors (age, no prior use of loop diuretics, blood urea nitrogen, and white blood cell count) of good diuretic response are useful indicators to support decision-making for carperitide administration. Additionally, the administration of carperitide within 2 hours of intravenous furosemide may lead to the improvement of pulmonary congestion.