Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Germany.
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm, Germany.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Feb;80:103573. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103573. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
Early mobilisation within 72 hours of intensive care unit admission counteracts complications caused by critical illness. The effect of different interventions on intensive care unit length of stay and other outcomes is unclear. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of various early mobilisation interventions within 72 hours of admission to the intensive care unit on length of stay and other outcomes.
A systematic review and (network) meta-analysis examining the effect of early mobilisation on length of stay in the intensive care unit and other outcomes, conducting searches in four databases. Randomised controlled trials were included from inception to 10/08/2022. Early mobilisation was defined as interventions that initiates and/or supports passive/active range-of-motion exercises within 72 hours of admission. In multi-arm studies, interventions used in other studies were declared as early intervention and were included in subgroup meta-analysis. Risk-of-bias was assessed using RoB2.
Of 29,680 studies screened, 18 studies with 1923 patients (three high, eleven some, four low risk-of-bias) and seven discriminable interventions of early mobilisation met inclusion criteria. Early mobilisation alone (WMD 0.78 days, 95 %CI [-1.38;-0.18], 11 studies, n = 1124) and early mobilisation with early nutrition (WMD -1.19 days, 95 %CI [-2.34;-0.03], 1 study, n = 100) were able to significantly shorten length of stay. Early mobilisation alone could also substantially shorten hospital length of stay (WMD -1.05 days, 95 %CI [-1.74;-0.36], 8 studies, n = 977). This effect in hospital length of stay was furthermore seen in the early intervention group compared with standard care (WMD -1.71 days, 95 %CI [-2.99;-0.43], 14 studies, n = 1587). Also, functionality and quality of life could significantly be improved by an early start of mobilisation.
In the network meta-analysis, early mobilisation alone and early mobilisation with early nutrition demonstrated a significant effect on intensive care length of stay. Early mobilisation could also reduce hospital length of stay and positively influence functionality and quality of life.
Early mobilisation and early mobilisation with early nutrition seemed to be beneficial compared to other interventions like cycling on intensive care length of stay.
在重症监护病房(ICU)入院后 72 小时内进行早期活动可以预防由危重病引起的并发症。不同干预措施对 ICU 住院时间和其他结局的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在研究 ICU 入院后 72 小时内进行各种早期活动干预对住院时间和其他结局的有效性。
本系统评价和(网络)荟萃分析研究了早期活动对 ICU 住院时间和其他结局的影响,在四个数据库中进行了检索。纳入了从研究开始到 2022 年 8 月 10 日的随机对照试验。早期活动定义为在入院后 72 小时内开始和/或支持被动/主动关节活动范围练习的干预措施。在多臂研究中,将其他研究中使用的干预措施声明为早期干预,并纳入亚组荟萃分析。使用 RoB2 评估偏倚风险。
在筛查的 29680 项研究中,有 18 项研究(3 项高风险、11 项中风险、4 项低风险)和 7 种可区分的早期活动干预措施符合纳入标准。单独的早期活动(WMD 0.78 天,95%CI [-1.38;-0.18],11 项研究,n=1124)和早期活动联合早期营养(WMD -1.19 天,95%CI [-2.34;-0.03],1 项研究,n=100)可以显著缩短住院时间。单独的早期活动还可以显著缩短住院时间(WMD -1.05 天,95%CI [-1.74;-0.36],8 项研究,n=977)。与标准护理相比,早期干预组的住院时间也有显著缩短(WMD -1.71 天,95%CI [-2.99;-0.43],14 项研究,n=1587)。此外,早期开始活动还可以显著改善功能和生活质量。
在网络荟萃分析中,单独的早期活动和早期活动联合早期营养对 ICU 住院时间有显著影响。早期活动还可以缩短住院时间,并对功能和生活质量产生积极影响。
与其他干预措施(如 ICU 内的自行车运动)相比,早期活动和早期活动联合早期营养似乎对 ICU 住院时间有好处。