Kegelaers Jolan
Brussels University Consultation Center, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Sport Psychology and Mental Support, Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1270887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270887. eCollection 2023.
Psychological resilience has gained considerable attention in sport. Nevertheless, the construct often remains poorly understood and multiple conceptual and methodological issues pervade the literature. The purpose of the present article is to provide a critical review of the commonly adopted methodologies to study resilience in sport. This review is divided into four sections. The first section will briefly discuss opposing conceptualizations of resilience as a static trait or a dynamic process. The second section will then discuss key methodological implications relating to the conceptualization of resilience as a dynamic process. In the third section, common methodologies to study resilience in sport are presented and critically reviewed. These methodologies are broadly divided into: (i) self-report resilience measures, (ii) qualitative research, and (iii) direct assessment of functioning in relation to observed adversity. In the final section, some avenues for future research are offered.
心理韧性在体育领域已受到相当多的关注。然而，这一概念往往仍未得到充分理解，文献中存在诸多概念和方法问题。本文旨在对体育领域中研究韧性时常用的方法进行批判性综述。本综述分为四个部分。第一部分将简要讨论将韧性视为静态特质或动态过程这两种相反的概念化方式。第二部分将讨论与将韧性概念化为动态过程相关的关键方法学意义。第三部分介绍并批判性地综述了体育领域中研究韧性的常见方法。这些方法大致分为：（i）自我报告的韧性测量方法，（ii）定性研究，以及（iii）与观察到的逆境相关的功能直接评估。在最后一部分，提出了一些未来研究的方向。
