Steinmann Silja, Hartl Johannes, Weidemann Sören, Füssel Katja, Kroll Claudia, Sebode Marcial, Lohse Ansgar Wilhelm, Schramm Christoph
I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
European Reference Network for Hepatological Diseases (ERN-RARE LIVER), Hamburg, Germany.
JHEP Rep. 2023 Aug 29;5(12):100898. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100898. eCollection 2023 Dec.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Concurrent fatty liver disease represents an emerging challenge in the care of individuals with autoimmune liver diseases (AILD). Therefore, we aimed to validate the ultrasound-based method of controlled-attenuation parameter (CAP) as a non-invasive tool to detect hepatic steatosis in individuals with AILD.
The diagnostic performance of CAP to determine biopsy-proven hepatic steatosis (>5%) was assessed in individuals with AILD (autoimmune hepatitis [AIH], primary biliary cholangitis [PBC], primary biliary cholangitis [PSC], or variant syndromes) who underwent liver biopsy at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2015-2020 by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. In AIH, the impact of disease activity was evaluated by assessment of CAP upon resolution of hepatic inflammation during follow-up.
Overall, 433 individuals with AILD (AIH: 218, PBC: 51, PSC: 85, PBC/AIH: 63, PSC/AIH: 16) were included. Histologically proven steatosis was present in 90 individuals (20.8%). Steatosis was less frequently observed in people with PSC (14%) than in other AILD. CAP values correlated positively with grade of steatosis ( = 0.39) and the BMI ( = 0.53). In PBC and PSC, the ROC curves defined an AUROC of 0.81 and 0.93 for detecting steatosis at an optimal cut-off of 276 dB/m (sensitivity: 0.71; specificity: 0.82) and 254 dB/m (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.85), respectively. In AIH, the diagnostic performance of CAP was significantly lower (AUROC = 0.72, = 0.009). However, resolution of hepatic inflammation under treatment was associated with a significant increase in CAP levels (median [IQR]: +38.0 [6-81] dB/m) and considerably improved diagnostic accuracy (AUROC = 0.85; cut-off: 288 dB/m; sensitivity: 0.67, specificity: 0.90).
In PBC and PSC, hepatic steatosis can be reliably detected by applying disease-specific thresholds of CAP. In AIH, the diagnostic accuracy of CAP is moderate at diagnosis, but improves after acute hepatitis has resolved.
Non-invasive estimation of fat content in the liver can be performed with the ultrasound-based method of controlled-attenuation parameter (CAP). Here, we showed that the presence of a concomitant fatty liver is frequent in people with autoimmune liver diseases and we determined disease-specific thresholds of CAP to best predict the presence of a fatty liver. CAP measurement was shown to be a valid tool to detect fatty liver in individuals with PSC and PBC; however, in AIH, CAP had limited accuracy especially when significant inflammatory activity was present in the liver. In the context of substantial liver inflammation, therefore, CAP values should be interpreted with caution, and measurements should be repeated after acute hepatitis has resolved.
并存的脂肪性肝病是自身免疫性肝病(AILD)患者治疗中面临的一个新挑战。因此,我们旨在验证基于超声的受控衰减参数(CAP)方法作为一种非侵入性工具,用于检测AILD患者的肝脂肪变性。
通过计算受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积,评估2015年至2020年间在汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心接受肝活检的AILD患者(自身免疫性肝炎[AIH]、原发性胆汁性胆管炎[PBC]、原发性硬化性胆管炎[PSC]或变异综合征)中CAP诊断经活检证实的肝脂肪变性(>5%)的诊断性能。在AIH中,通过随访期间评估CAP对肝脏炎症消退的影响来评估疾病活动的影响。
共纳入433例AILD患者(AIH:218例,PBC:51例,PSC:85例,PBC/AIH:63例,PSC/AIH:16例)。90例(20.8%)患者经组织学证实存在脂肪变性。PSC患者(14%)的脂肪变性发生率低于其他AILD患者。CAP值与脂肪变性分级(r = 0.39)和体重指数(r = 0.53)呈正相关。在PBC和PSC中,ROC曲线确定检测脂肪变性的AUROC分别为0.81和0.93,最佳截断值分别为276 dB/m(敏感性:0.71;特异性:0.82)和254 dB/m(敏感性:0.91,特异性:0.85)。在AIH中,CAP的诊断性能显著较低(AUROC = 0.72,P = 0.009)。然而,治疗期间肝脏炎症的消退与CAP水平显著升高相关(中位数[四分位间距]:+38.0[6 - 81]dB/m),诊断准确性显著提高(AUROC = 0.85;截断值:288 dB/m;敏感性:0.67,特异性:0.90)。
在PBC和PSC中,应用疾病特异性的CAP阈值可可靠地检测肝脂肪变性。在AIH中,CAP的诊断准确性在诊断时中等,但在急性肝炎消退后有所提高。
可通过基于超声的受控衰减参数(CAP)方法对肝脏脂肪含量进行非侵入性估计。在此,我们表明自身免疫性肝病患者中并存脂肪肝很常见,并且我们确定了疾病特异性的CAP阈值以最佳预测脂肪肝的存在。CAP测量被证明是检测PSC和PBC患者脂肪肝的有效工具;然而,在AIH中,CAP的准确性有限,尤其是当肝脏存在显著炎症活动时。因此,在存在大量肝脏炎症的情况下,应谨慎解释CAP值,并且在急性肝炎消退后应重复测量。