Barsan Valentin, Li Yimei, Prabhu Snehit, Baggott Christina, Nguyen Khanh, Pacenta Holly, Phillips Christine L, Rossoff Jenna, Stefanski Heather, Talano Julie-An, Moskop Amy, Baumeister Susanne, Verneris Michael R, Myers Gary Douglas, Karras Nicole A, Cooper Stacy, Qayed Muna, Hermiston Michelle, Satwani Prakash, Krupski Christa, Keating Amy, Fabrizio Vanessa, Chinnabhandar Vasant, Kunicki Michael, Curran Kevin J, Mackall Crystal L, Laetsch Theodore W, Schultz Liora M
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1000 Welch Road, Suite 300, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia/University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Oct 26;65:102268. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102268. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Tisagenlecleucel was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B-ALL in ≥2nd relapse. Outcomes of patients receiving commercial tisagenlecleucel upon 1st relapse have yet to be established. We aimed to report real-world tisagenlecleucel utilisation patterns and outcomes across indications, specifically including patients treated in 1st relapse, an indication omitted from formal FDA approval.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of real-world tisagenlecleucel utilisation patterns across 185 children and young adults treated between August 30, 2017 and March 6, 2020 from centres participating in the Pediatric Real-World CAR Consortium (PRWCC), within the United States. We described definitions of refractory B-ALL used in the real-world setting and categorised patients by reported Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell indication, including refractory, 1st relapse and ≥2nd relapse B-ALL. We analysed baseline patient characteristics and post-tisagenlecleucel outcomes across defined cohorts.
Thirty-six percent (n = 67) of our cohort received tisagenlecleucel following 1st relapse. Of 66 evaluable patients, 56 (85%, 95% CI 74-92%) achieved morphologic complete response. Overall-survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 1-year were 69%, (95% CI 58-82%) and 49%, (95% CI 37-64%), respectively, with survival outcomes statistically comparable to remaining patients (OS; , EFS; ). Notably, toxicity was increased in this cohort, warranting further study. Interestingly, of 30 patients treated for upfront refractory disease, 23 (77%, 95% CI 58-90%) had flow cytometry and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) minimum residual disease (MRD)-only disease at the end of induction, not meeting the historic morphologic definition of refractory.
Our findings suggested that tisagenlecleucel response and survival rates overlap across patients treated with upfront refractory B-ALL, B-ALL ≥2nd relapse and B-ALL in 1st relapse. We additionally highlighted that definitions of refractory B-ALL are evolving beyond morphologic measures of residual disease.
St. Baldrick's/Stand Up 2 Cancer, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research.
2017年,替沙格赛基因疗法(tisagenlecleucel)获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)以及≥第二次复发的B-ALL。接受商业化替沙格赛基因疗法治疗的患者首次复发后的预后情况尚未明确。我们旨在报告替沙格赛基因疗法在各适应症中的真实应用模式及预后情况,特别包括首次复发时接受治疗的患者,这一适应症未被FDA正式批准纳入。
我们对2017年8月30日至2020年3月6日期间在美国参与儿科真实世界嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞联盟(PRWCC)的各中心接受治疗的185名儿童和青年成人中替沙格赛基因疗法的真实应用模式进行了回顾性分析。我们描述了真实世界中难治性B-ALL的定义,并根据报告的CAR T细胞适应症对患者进行分类,包括难治性、首次复发和≥第二次复发的B-ALL。我们分析了各定义队列中患者的基线特征及接受替沙格赛基因疗法后的预后情况。
我们队列中的36%(n = 67)患者在首次复发后接受了替沙格赛基因疗法。在66名可评估患者中,56名(85%,95%置信区间74-92%)实现了形态学完全缓解。1年时的总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)分别为69%(95%置信区间58-82%)和49%(95%置信区间37-64%),生存结果与其余患者在统计学上具有可比性(OS; ,EFS; )。值得注意的是,该队列中的毒性有所增加,需要进一步研究。有趣的是,在30名接受一线难治性疾病治疗的患者中,23名(77%,95%置信区间58-90%)在诱导结束时仅通过流式细胞术和/或下一代测序(NGS)检测到微小残留病(MRD),不符合难治性疾病的既往形态学定义。
我们的研究结果表明,接受一线难治性B-ALL、≥第二次复发的B-ALL以及首次复发的B-ALL治疗的患者,其替沙格赛基因疗法的反应率和生存率存在重叠。我们还强调,难治性B-ALL的定义正在从残留病的形态学指标向外扩展。
圣巴德里克基金会/勇敢抗癌组织、帕克癌症免疫疗法研究所、弗吉尼亚州以及D.K.路德维希癌症研究基金。