Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Rural Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):476-482. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12811. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
Our goal was to compare locations of COVID-19 vaccine provision in urban and rural communities over the course of the pandemic.
We used the Iowa Immunization Registry Information System (IRIS) to identify the organizations providing COVID-19 vaccines (eg, pharmacies, public health departments, and medical providers). Proportions of first-dose vaccines by organization type and patient census-based statistical area were generated. We calculated Chi-square tests to assess differences among metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore communities.
IRIS data revealed that 64% (n = 2,043,251) of Iowans received their first COVID-19 vaccine between December 14, 2020, and December 31, 2022. For metropolitan-dwelling individuals, most first doses were administered at pharmacies (53%), with similar trends observed for micropolitan (49%) and noncore (42%) individuals. The second most common location for metropolitan individuals was medical practices (17%); public health clinics and departments were the second most common provider for micropolitan (26%) and noncore (33%) individuals. These trends shifted over time. In December 2020, hospitals were the most common vaccine provider for everyone, but by December 2022, medical providers were the most common source for metropolitan individuals, and pharmacies were most common for micropolitan and noncore individuals.
Trends in the type of vaccine provider differentiated metropolitan residents from micropolitan and noncore residents. For the latter groups, local public health departments played a more significant role. Across all groups, pharmacists emerged as a critical vaccine provider. Our findings can be used to plan for seasonal vaccine campaigns as well as potential future mass vaccination campaigns.
本研究旨在比较疫情期间城市和农村社区新冠疫苗接种点的位置。
我们使用爱荷华州免疫登记信息系统(IRIS)来识别提供新冠疫苗的组织(如药房、公共卫生部门和医疗服务提供者)。根据组织类型和基于患者普查的统计区域,生成首剂疫苗的比例。我们计算了卡方检验,以评估大都市、小城市和非核心社区之间的差异。
IRIS 数据显示,2020 年 12 月 14 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间,64%(n=2043251)的爱荷华人接种了第一剂新冠疫苗。对于居住在大都市的人来说,大多数首剂疫苗是在药房接种的(53%),小城市(49%)和非核心区(42%)的人也有类似的趋势。大都市人群中第二常见的接种点是医疗实践(17%);公共卫生诊所和部门是小城市(26%)和非核心区(33%)人群的第二常见接种点。这些趋势随着时间的推移而变化。2020 年 12 月,医院是最常见的疫苗接种点,但到 2022 年 12 月,医疗服务提供者成为大都市人群最常见的疫苗来源,而对于小城市和非核心区人群来说,药店是最常见的疫苗接种点。
疫苗接种点类型的趋势将大都市居民与小城市和非核心区居民区分开来。对于后两者,当地公共卫生部门发挥了更重要的作用。在所有群体中,药剂师都是关键的疫苗接种提供者。我们的研究结果可用于规划季节性疫苗接种活动以及潜在的未来大规模疫苗接种活动。