Haines Heidi, Sursely Amanda, Pham Hanh, Beltran Rylee, Sewell Daniel K, Reinders Lina Tucker, Askelson Natoshia, Dixon Sarah, Emrich Kaitlin, Estle Christine, Lewis Michelle, Parker Edith, Reyes Jimmy, Walkner Laurie, Sittig Kelly Wells, Afifi Rima A
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Iowa Public Health Association, Des Moines, IA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;13:1597941. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597941. eCollection 2025.
SARS-CoV-2 was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Studies have characterized some of the negative impact of the pandemic on public health workers (PHW), but few have explored the strength and coping strategies used. Our study documents the experiences of PHW in Iowa during the pandemic.
We used an innovative mixed methods data collection tool, SenseMaker to gather stories from PHW in Iowa between March and July 2022. Participants provided additional data about their story via structured follow-up questions. We conducted descriptive analyses of the quantitative questions. A qualitative thematic and sentiment analysis was applied to all stories.
The final sample size was 163 stories. PHW who submitted stories identified as mostly white (93.9%), and women (83.4%). Respondents were most likely to feel that in the story they told: the ability to act was out of their control; the strongest influence was from political considerations; decisions were made out of necessity; they wished for more focus on evidence-based public health. PHW were most likely to describe their emotional state at the height of the pandemic as frustration (61%), uncertainty (55%), and helplessness (50%). Those who felt in control were more likely to express positive emotions. Qualitative thematic analysis of these stories revealed 8 themes, highlighting facilitators (e.g., strong partnerships and collaborations) and barriers (e.g., politicization and controversial government response) to effective pandemic response.
The stories PHW shared powerfully illustrate the context of the pandemic in Iowa, a state that spent the least time under high stringency policies.
2020年3月,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)被宣布为全球大流行病。已有研究描述了该大流行病对公共卫生工作者(PHW)的一些负面影响,但很少有研究探讨其所采用的应对力度和策略。我们的研究记录了爱荷华州公共卫生工作者在大流行期间的经历。
我们使用了一种创新的混合方法数据收集工具SenseMaker,从2022年3月至7月期间收集爱荷华州公共卫生工作者的故事。参与者通过结构化的后续问题提供了关于他们故事的更多数据。我们对定量问题进行了描述性分析。对所有故事进行了定性主题和情感分析。
最终样本量为163个故事。提交故事的公共卫生工作者大多为白人(93.9%)和女性(83.4%)。受访者最有可能在他们讲述的故事中感觉到:行动能力超出了他们的控制;最强烈的影响来自政治因素;决策是出于必要;他们希望更多地关注循证公共卫生。公共卫生工作者最有可能将他们在大流行高峰期的情绪状态描述为沮丧(61%)、不确定(55%)和无助(50%)。那些感觉有掌控力的人更有可能表达积极情绪。对这些故事的定性主题分析揭示出8个主题,突出了有效应对大流行的促进因素(如强大的伙伴关系和合作)和障碍(如政治化和有争议的政府应对措施)。
公共卫生工作者分享的这些故事有力地说明了爱荷华州大流行的背景情况,该州处于严格政策下的时间最短。