Meredith Meghan E, Steimle Lauren N, Radke Stephanie M
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 29:2023.10.31.23297779. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.31.23297779.
Lack of access to risk-appropriate maternity services, particularly for rural residents, is thought to be a leading contributor to disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. There are several existing measures of access to obstetric care in the literature and popular media. In this study, we explored how current measures of obstetric access inform the number and location of additional obstetric care facilities required to improve access.
We formulated two facility location optimization models to determine the number of new facilities required to minimize the number of reproductive-aged women who lack access to obstetric care. We define regions with a lack of access as either maternity care deserts, designated by the March of Dimes to be counties with no obstetric care facility or obstetric providers, or regions further than 50 miles from critical care obstetric (CCO) services. We gathered information on hospitals with obstetric services from Georgia Department of Public Health public reports and estimated the female reproductive-age population by census block group using the American Community Survey.
Out of the 1,910,308 reproductive-aged women who live in Georgia, 104,158 (5.5%) live in maternity care deserts, 150,563 (7.9%) reproductive-aged women live further than 50 miles from CCO services, and 38,202 (2.0%) live in both maternity care desert and further than 50 miles from CCO services. Our optimization analysis suggests that at least 56 new obstetric care facilities (a 67% increase) would be required to eliminate maternity care deserts in Georgia. However, and the expansion of 8 facilities would ensure all women in Georgia live within 50 miles of CCO services.
Current measures of access to obstetric care may not be sufficient for evaluating access and planning action toward improvements. In a state like Georgia with a large number of small counties, eliminating maternity care deserts would require a prohibitively large number of new obstetric care facilities. This work suggests that additional measures and tools are needed to estimate the number and type of obstetric care facilities that best match practical resources to meet obstetric care needs.
无法获得与风险相适应的孕产妇服务,尤其是农村居民,被认为是孕产妇发病率和死亡率差异的主要原因。文献和大众媒体中有几种现有的衡量产科护理可及性的方法。在本研究中,我们探讨了当前的产科可及性衡量方法如何为改善可及性所需的额外产科护理设施的数量和位置提供信息。
我们制定了两个设施选址优化模型,以确定为使无法获得产科护理的育龄妇女数量最少而所需的新设施数量。我们将缺乏可及性的地区定义为产妇护理荒漠,即由美国疾病控制与预防中心指定的没有产科护理设施或产科提供者的县,或距离重症产科护理(CCO)服务超过50英里的地区。我们从佐治亚州公共卫生部的公开报告中收集了有关提供产科服务医院的信息,并使用美国社区调查按普查街区组估计了育龄女性人口。
在居住在佐治亚州的1,910,308名育龄妇女中,104,158名(5.5%)生活在产妇护理荒漠地区,150,563名(7.9%)育龄妇女居住在距离CCO服务超过50英里的地方,38,202名(2.0%)既生活在产妇护理荒漠地区又居住在距离CCO服务超过50英里的地方。我们的优化分析表明,佐治亚州至少需要56个新的产科护理设施(增加67%)才能消除产妇护理荒漠。然而,增设8个设施将确保佐治亚州的所有妇女都居住在距离CCO服务50英里以内的地方。
当前的产科护理可及性衡量方法可能不足以评估可及性并规划改善措施。在像佐治亚州这样有大量小县的州,消除产妇护理荒漠需要数量多得令人望而却步的新产科护理设施。这项工作表明,需要额外的措施和工具来估计最能使实际资源与满足产科护理需求相匹配的产科护理设施的数量和类型。