Suppr超能文献

利用母婴保健荒漠衡量获得产科保健服务进展情况的意义:混合整数最优化分析。

The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure progress in access to obstetric care: a mixed-integer optimization analysis.

机构信息

H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 755 Ferst Dr NW, Atlanta, GA, 30318, United States.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 30;24(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11135-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of access to risk-appropriate maternity services, particularly for rural residents, is thought to be a leading contributor to disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. There are several existing measures of access to obstetric care in the literature and popular media. In this study, we explored how current measures of obstetric access inform the number and location of additional obstetric care facilities required to improve access.

METHODS

We formulated two facility location optimization models to determine the number of new facilities required to minimize the number of reproductive-aged women who lack access to obstetric care. We define regions with a lack of access as either maternity care deserts, designated by the March of Dimes to be counties with no obstetric care facility or obstetric providers, or regions further than 50 miles from critical care obstetric (CCO) services. We gathered information on hospitals with obstetric services from Georgia Department of Public Health public reports and estimated the female reproductive-age population by census block group using the American Community Survey.

RESULTS

Out of the 1,910,308 reproductive-aged women who live in Georgia, 104,158 (5.5%) live in maternity care deserts, 150,563 (7.9%) reproductive-aged women live further than 50 miles from CCO services, and 38,202 (2.0%) live in both maternity care desert and further than 50 miles from CCO services. Our optimization analysis suggests that at least 56 new obstetric care facilities (a 67% increase) would be required to eliminate maternity care deserts in Georgia. However, the expansion of 8 facilities would ensure all women in Georgia live within 50 miles of CCO services.

CONCLUSIONS

Current measures of access to obstetric care may not be sufficient for evaluating access and planning action toward improvements. In a state like Georgia with a large number of small counties, eliminating maternity care deserts would require a prohibitively large number of new obstetric care facilities. This work suggests that additional measures and tools are needed to estimate the number and type of obstetric care facilities that best match practical resources to meet obstetric care needs.

摘要

背景

获得适当的产科服务机会不足,尤其是农村居民,被认为是导致产妇发病率和死亡率差异的主要原因。文献和大众媒体中有几种现有的产科护理机会评估方法。在这项研究中,我们探讨了当前的产科服务机会评估方法如何告知需要增加多少产科服务设施以及这些设施的位置,以改善服务机会。

方法

我们制定了两个设施选址优化模型,以确定需要增加的新设施数量,从而使无法获得产科护理的育龄妇女数量最少。我们将缺乏服务机会的地区定义为产科护理荒漠地区,这是由美国 March of Dimes 指定的没有产科护理设施或产科提供者的县,或者距离关键产科护理(CCO)服务 50 英里以上的地区。我们从佐治亚州公共卫生部的公共报告中收集了提供产科服务的医院信息,并使用美国社区调查(American Community Survey)按普查区组估计育龄妇女人数。

结果

在佐治亚州 1910308 名育龄妇女中,有 104158 名(5.5%)生活在产科护理荒漠地区,有 150563 名(7.9%)育龄妇女距离 CCO 服务 50 英里以上,有 38202 名(2.0%)同时生活在产科护理荒漠地区和距离 CCO 服务 50 英里以上的地区。我们的优化分析表明,要消除佐治亚州的产科护理荒漠地区,至少需要增加 56 个新的产科护理设施(增加 67%)。然而,只需扩展 8 个设施就可以确保佐治亚州所有妇女都在 CCO 服务 50 英里以内。

结论

当前的产科护理机会评估方法可能不足以评估服务机会并规划改进措施。在像佐治亚州这样有大量小县的州,消除产科护理荒漠地区需要增加大量的新产科护理设施。这项工作表明,需要额外的措施和工具来估计最佳匹配实际资源以满足产科护理需求的产科护理设施的数量和类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfca/11137923/723f5406ef4c/12913_2024_11135_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验