Adaji Aishatu Eleojo
Osun State University College of Law.
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 24:rs.3.rs-3293485. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293485/v1.
The Nigerian Revised National Policy on Science, Technology and Innovation 2022 formally proposed the adoption of open science principles among researchers and all other stakeholders in Nigeria. With regard to health research, open science would allow the dissemination and sharing of scientific data and other research outputs among health researchers, thereby accelerating the scientific process and the development of innovative solutions for health challenges. However, in this context, the existing privacy and data protection rules can profoundly affect the adoption and sustainability of open science in Nigeria. This is because researchers rely heavily on accessing and sharing personal information and the biological samples of human subjects. Therefore, this study identifies and examines possible legal issues and challenges arising from the existing privacy and data protection rules as researchers adopt an open science approach to health research in Nigeria.
This study adopts a qualitative approach, providing a legal analysis of existing national, regional and international instruments on privacy, data protection and health research in the context of open science in Nigeria. The study also draws on relevant research and non-research articles on open science, health research, privacy and data protection published in English. Searches for the articles were conducted on various sites through the Google search engine, using terms such as 'sharing of data', 'data privacy', 'principles of data protection', 'open science', etc.
RESULTS/CONCLUSION: The study finds that the right to privacy and data protection could affect the promotion, adoption and sustainability of open science among health researchers in Nigeria, as well as their ability to engage in open collaborative research with their peers in Africa and other jurisdictions. To prevent infringements of the privacy and data protection rules by researchers and thereby ensure the adoption of open science approaches in health research, the study further identifies various legal options for researchers, including using personal data or material transfer arrangements, which, among other things, require recipients or users of human data or biological samples to commit not to re-identify human subjects.
《2022年尼日利亚科学、技术与创新国家政策修订版》正式提议在尼日利亚的研究人员及所有其他利益相关者中采用开放科学原则。在健康研究方面,开放科学将允许健康研究人员之间传播和共享科学数据及其他研究成果,从而加速科学进程并推动针对健康挑战的创新解决方案的开发。然而,在这种情况下,现有的隐私和数据保护规则可能会深刻影响开放科学在尼日利亚的采用和可持续性。这是因为研究人员严重依赖获取和共享个人信息以及人类受试者的生物样本。因此,本研究识别并审视了在尼日利亚研究人员采用开放科学方法进行健康研究时,现有隐私和数据保护规则可能引发的法律问题和挑战。
本研究采用定性方法,在尼日利亚开放科学背景下,对现有的关于隐私、数据保护和健康研究的国家、区域和国际文书进行法律分析。该研究还借鉴了以英文发表的关于开放科学、健康研究、隐私和数据保护的相关研究及非研究文章。通过谷歌搜索引擎在各个网站上搜索文章,使用了“数据共享”“数据隐私”“数据保护原则”“开放科学”等术语。
结果/结论:研究发现,隐私和数据保护权可能会影响尼日利亚健康研究人员对开放科学的推广、采用和可持续性,以及他们与非洲及其他司法管辖区的同行开展开放合作研究的能力。为防止研究人员违反隐私和数据保护规则,从而确保在健康研究中采用开放科学方法,该研究进一步为研究人员确定了各种法律选择,包括使用个人数据或材料转让安排,其中要求人类数据或生物样本的接收者或使用者承诺不重新识别人类受试者。