Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of General Surgery, Huantai Branch of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Zibo, Shandong, China.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Feb 1;67(2):333-338. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003049. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
Parastomal hernia is a major long-term complication after abdominoperineal resection. Extraperitoneal colostomy has been proposed as an effective step for parastomal hernia prevention, but it has not been widely used as it is technically demanding and time-consuming. We proposed a modified approach for extraperitoneal colostomy creation by entering the extraperitoneal space through the arcuate line of the posterior rectus sheath.
To evaluate the safety, difficulty, and efficacy of long-term parastomal hernia prevention of the modified approach for extraperitoneal colostomy creation compared with the conventional transperitoneal colostomy approach.
This was a retrospective evaluation of a surgical and video database.
This was a single-institution retrospective study.
Clinical data of 74 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection surgery from January 2019 to January 2020 in the Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, were retrospectively reviewed.
Baseline characteristics, time required for colostomy creation (from skin incision to colostomy maturation), perioperative complications, and long-term colostomy-related complications were compared.
Baseline characteristics did not differ between the 2 approaches. The BMI level ranged from 19.5 to 29.4 for patients undergoing extraperitoneal approach. Time required for colostomy creation median [interquartile range], (22 [21-25] minutes for extraperitoneal vs 23 [21-25] minutes for transperitoneal, p = 0.861) were comparable between the 2 approaches. The cumulative incidence of parastomal hernia was significantly greater with transperitoneal colostomy than extraperitoneal colostomy at 2 and 3 years postoperatively (16.2% vs 0%, p = 0.025, and 21.6% vs 0%, p = 0.005). The remaining perioperative complications and long-term colostomy-related complications did not differ between the 2 approaches.
This study is limited by its retrospective design and small sample size.
The modified approach for extraperitoneal colostomy creation is safe, technically simple, and effective for long-term parastomal hernia prevention in patients with a BMI of 19.5 to 29.4.
造口旁疝是腹会阴切除术后的一个主要长期并发症。腹膜外结肠造口术已被提议作为预防造口旁疝的有效措施,但由于其技术要求高且耗时,因此尚未广泛应用。我们提出了一种通过后直肌鞘的弓状线进入腹膜外间隙来创建腹膜外结肠造口的改良方法。
评估改良的腹膜外结肠造口术与传统的经腹腔结肠造口术相比,在预防长期造口旁疝方面的安全性、难度和效果。
这是一项对手术和视频数据库的回顾性评估。
这是一项单机构回顾性研究。
回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月在山东大学齐鲁医院普通外科接受腹腔镜腹会阴切除手术的 74 例患者的临床资料。
比较造口术的基线特征、造口术创建所需的时间(从皮肤切开至造口成熟)、围手术期并发症和长期造口相关并发症。
两种方法的基线特征无差异。接受腹膜外入路的患者 BMI 水平为 19.5 至 29.4。造口术创建所需的时间中位数[四分位距],(腹膜外 22 [21-25]分钟与经腹腔 23 [21-25]分钟,p = 0.861)在两种方法之间相当。术后 2 年和 3 年,经腹腔结肠造口术的造口旁疝累积发生率明显高于腹膜外结肠造口术(16.2%比 0%,p = 0.025;21.6%比 0%,p = 0.005)。两种方法的其余围手术期并发症和长期造口相关并发症无差异。
本研究受到回顾性设计和小样本量的限制。
对于 BMI 为 19.5 至 29.4 的患者,改良的腹膜外结肠造口术是一种安全、技术简单且有效的预防长期造口旁疝的方法。