Suppr超能文献

改良经肛会阴联合切除术在低位直肠癌切除中的应用。

Application of modified extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer resection.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.

Department of General Surgery, Huantai Branch of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Zibo, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6177-6183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11246-3. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ELAPE surgery has been carried out in our center for a long time, and some modifications have been made in clinical practice. In this study, we compared conventional ELAPE operation with modified ELAPE operation to investigate the efficacy and safety of modified ELAPE operation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from 339 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection from 2017 to 2021 in the Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Patients were classified into modified ELAPE groups (199 patients) and conventional ELAPE groups (140 patients). Total operation time, reconstruction time, postoperative hospital stay, total cost, intraoperative data, postoperative short-term and long-term complications and tumor recurrence were compared.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Total operation time was less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (190.6 ± 33.1 min vs 230.1 ± 51.6 min, P = 0.022). Pelvic floor reconstruction time was also less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (4.3 ± 1.2 min vs 11.9 ± 1.7 min, P = 0.004). Positive CRM was observed in 11 and 9 patients in modified ELAPE groups and conventional ELAPE groups (P = 0.744). IOP occurred in 12 and 7 patients in modified ELAPE group and conventional ELAPE group (P = 0.701). Total cost was also less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (9004 ± 1146 USD vs 10,336 ± 2047 USD, P = 0.031). The incidence of parastomal hernia was less with modified ELAPE group compared to conventional ELAPE group (7/199 vs 22/140, P < 0.001). Three-year follow-up data did not show any difference in overall survival rate or local occurrence between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Modified ELAPE surgery is technically safe and feasible, and oncologically comparable to that of conventional ELAPE surgery, which can be considered for popularization and application.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜 ELAPE 手术在我院已开展多年,并在临床实践中进行了一些改良。本研究旨在比较传统 ELAPE 手术与改良 ELAPE 手术的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析 2017 年至 2021 年我院普外科行腹会阴联合切除术的 339 例低位直肠癌患者的临床资料,患者分为改良 ELAPE 组(199 例)和传统 ELAPE 组(140 例)。比较两组患者的总手术时间、重建时间、术后住院时间、总费用、术中资料、术后短期和长期并发症及肿瘤复发情况。

结果

两组患者的基线资料比较差异无统计学意义。改良 ELAPE 组患者的总手术时间较传统 ELAPE 组短[(190.6±33.1)min 比(230.1±51.6)min,P=0.022],盆底重建时间也较传统 ELAPE 组短[(4.3±1.2)min 比(11.9±1.7)min,P=0.004]。改良 ELAPE 组和传统 ELAPE 组阳性环周切缘(CRM)分别为 11 例和 9 例(P=0.744),术中直肠穿孔(IOP)分别为 12 例和 7 例(P=0.701)。改良 ELAPE 组患者的总费用较传统 ELAPE 组低[(9004±1146)USD 比(10336±2047)USD,P=0.031]。改良 ELAPE 组患者的造口旁疝发生率较传统 ELAPE 组低[7/199(3.5%)比 22/140(15.7%),P<0.001]。两组患者的 3 年总生存率和局部复发率差异均无统计学意义。

结论

改良 ELAPE 手术技术安全可行,与传统 ELAPE 手术相比在肿瘤学方面无差异,可考虑推广应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验