School of Health and Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, UK.
Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1043-1065. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12981. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
People who have communication difficulties may benefit from using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Understanding and measuring outcomes from the use of AAC is an important part of evaluating the impact of devices and services. Outcome measurement needs to reflect the changing nature of the impact of using AAC on an individual's ability to participate in activities of daily life. There is a limited understanding of the concepts that should inform the evaluation of outcomes from AAC device provision, nor how people's expectations from AAC may change over time.
To inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure for AAC by understanding more about people's expectations from AAC and how these change over time.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: A longitudinal qualitative research study was designed and carried out with seven participants over a period of 2 years. Participants were recruited from a regional specialist assessment service for AAC in the south-west of the UK. Four semi-structured interviews were carried out: (1) before assessment for AAC, (2) after assessment, (3) directly after provision of an AAC device and (4) between 6 and 12 months after provision. An original analytic method was used in this study that built on the principles of longitudinal interpretative phenomenology analysis, applied with a dialogic theoretical lens. This approach enabled the inclusion of a range of multimodal and embodied data collected to this study and allowed the research team to draw out salient themes across the cohort group while attending to the influence of time and context on experience.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The results confirm and extend the three core concepts that were used to guide analysis: changes; contexts; future possibilities. The contextual and temporal influences on outcomes attainable from AAC for this cohort were also identified and illustrated through cross-case comparison. Deeper, analytic, and conceptual engagement with theory, which was then applied to analysis of the data, provided methodological rigour in the study. The results enhance our understanding of people's hopes and expectations from AAC and how these change over time.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This qualitative longitudinal research study provides new insights into the journeys of people who experience communication disability, and the shifting nature of their sense of identity as they engage with, and learn from using, AAC. The study is significant as it attends to the dynamic nature of experience and how contextual and experiential factors influence people's hopes and expectations from AAC. The paper presents an original application of longitudinal qualitative research methodology with people who use AAC which can be further applied and tested in the field of communication disability research.
What is already known on this subject We did not know the impact that time has on the concepts that have been identified to represent important outcomes from AAC. The existing concepts used to define outcomes from AAC were not adequately conceptualized to develop a patient-reported outcome measure. This study sought to extend our knowledge about outcomes from AAC. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This study adds to the methodological toolkit available for qualitative inquiry in the field of communication disability research by presenting a longitudinal qualitative research methodology. It adds depth to our understanding of the concepts that underpin outcomes from AAC and highlights the dynamic nature of contexts and how this influences desired outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This longitudinal qualitative research study provides a broader perspective on the experience of getting AAC. It will enable clinicians to better navigate the contextual and transitionary factors that influence people's experience of acquiring AAC devices. The enhanced concepts described will also support clinical conversations that consider the wider facets of communication and what AAC can add to existing communicative tool kits beyond getting a message across.
有沟通困难的人可能会受益于使用辅助和替代沟通(AAC)。理解和衡量 AAC 使用的结果是评估设备和服务影响的重要部分。结果测量需要反映使用 AAC 对个人日常生活活动参与能力的影响的变化性质。人们对告知 AAC 设备提供结果评估的概念了解有限,也不了解人们对 AAC 的期望如何随时间变化。
通过了解更多关于人们对 AAC 的期望以及这些期望如何随时间变化,为 AAC 制定患者报告的结果衡量标准提供信息。
本研究设计并进行了一项纵向定性研究,在 2 年内对 7 名参与者进行了研究。参与者是从英国西南部的一个区域 AAC 专业评估服务机构招募的。共进行了 4 次半结构化访谈:(1)在 AAC 评估前,(2)评估后,(3)AAC 设备提供后直接进行,(4)提供后 6 至 12 个月进行。本研究采用了一种原始的分析方法,该方法基于纵向解释现象学分析的原则,并采用对话理论镜头。这种方法使研究小组能够在关注时间和背景对经验的影响的同时,从队列组中得出显著的主题。
研究结果证实并扩展了用于指导分析的三个核心概念:变化、背景、未来可能性。还通过跨案例比较确定并说明了本队列中可从 AAC 获得的结果的背景和时间影响。对理论进行更深入、分析性和概念性的参与,然后将其应用于数据分析,为研究提供了方法上的严谨性。研究结果加深了我们对人们对 AAC 的希望和期望的理解,以及这些期望如何随时间变化。
这项定性纵向研究为经历沟通障碍的人提供了新的见解,以及他们在使用 AAC 时的身份感的变化性质。该研究意义重大,因为它关注体验的动态性质以及背景和体验因素如何影响人们对 AAC 的希望和期望。本文介绍了一种在使用 AAC 的人群中进行纵向定性研究方法的应用,该方法可在沟通障碍研究领域进一步应用和测试。
我们对时间对已经确定代表 AAC 结果的重要概念的影响知之甚少。用于定义 AAC 结果的现有概念没有充分概念化,无法开发患者报告的结果衡量标准。本研究旨在扩展我们对 AAC 结果的认识。本研究通过提出一种用于沟通障碍研究领域的定性研究的纵向定性研究方法,为现有的定性研究方法工具包增添了深度。它加深了我们对支撑 AAC 结果的概念的理解,并强调了背景的动态性质以及它如何影响所需的结果。这项工作有哪些潜在或实际的临床意义?这项纵向定性研究为获取 AAC 的体验提供了更广阔的视角。它将使临床医生能够更好地驾驭影响人们获取 AAC 设备体验的背景和过渡因素。描述的增强概念还将支持临床对话,考虑到沟通的更广泛方面,以及 AAC 如何在现有的沟通工具包之外为现有沟通工具包增加信息传达以外的内容。