Division of Interventional Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Jan;54(1):181-196. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05803-6. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
The management of pediatric trauma with trans-arterial embolization is uncommon, even in level 1 trauma centers; hence, there is a dearth of literature on this subject compared to the adult experience.
To describe a single-center, level 1 trauma center experience with arterial embolization for pediatric trauma.
A retrospective review was performed to identify demographics, transfusion requirements, pre-procedure imaging, procedural details, adverse events, and arterial embolization outcomes over a 19-year period. Twenty children (age 4.5 months to 17 years, median 13.5 years; weight 3.6 to 108 kg, median 53 kg) were included. Technical success was defined as angiographic resolution of the bleeding-related abnormality on post-embolization angiography or successful empiric embolization in the absence of an angiographic finding. Clinical success was defined as not requiring additional intervention after embolization.
Seventy-five percent (n=15/20) of patients required red blood cell transfusions prior to embolization with a mean volume replacement 64 ml/kg (range 12-166 ml/kg) and the median time from injury to intervention was 3 days (range 0-16 days). Technical success was achieved in 100% (20/20) of children while clinical success was achieved in 80% (n=16/20). For the 4 children (20%) with continued bleeding following initial embolization, 2 underwent repeat embolization, 1 underwent surgery, and 1 underwent repeat embolization and surgery. Mortality prior to discharge was 15% (n=3). A post-embolization mild adverse event included one groin hematoma, while a severe adverse event included one common iliac artery pseudoaneurysm requiring open surgical ligation.
In this single-center experience, arterial embolization for hemorrhage control in children after trauma is feasible but can be challenging and the clinical failure rate of 20% in this series reflects this complexity. Standardization of pre-embolization trauma assessment parameters and embolic techniques may improve outcomes.
即使在一级创伤中心,儿童创伤的经动脉栓塞治疗也不常见,因此,与成人经验相比,这方面的文献相对较少。
描述一家一级创伤中心在儿童创伤中进行动脉栓塞的单中心经验。
对 19 年来的病例进行回顾性分析,以确定患者的人口统计学资料、输血需求、术前影像学检查、手术细节、不良事件和动脉栓塞的结果。共纳入 20 名儿童(年龄 4.5 个月至 17 岁,中位数 13.5 岁;体重 3.6 至 108 公斤,中位数 53 公斤)。技术成功定义为栓塞后血管造影显示出血相关异常缓解,或在无血管造影发现的情况下成功进行经验性栓塞。临床成功定义为栓塞后无需进一步干预。
75%(20/20)的患儿在栓塞前需要输注红细胞,平均容量置换 64 ml/kg(范围 12-166 ml/kg),从受伤到干预的中位时间为 3 天(范围 0-16 天)。100%(20/20)的患儿达到技术成功,80%(20/20)的患儿达到临床成功。对于最初栓塞后仍有持续出血的 4 名患儿(20%),其中 2 名接受了重复栓塞,1 名接受了手术,1 名接受了重复栓塞和手术。出院前死亡率为 15%(n=3)。1 例轻度栓塞后不良事件为腹股沟血肿,1 例严重不良事件为髂内动脉假性动脉瘤,需行开放手术结扎。
在本单中心经验中,儿童创伤后经动脉栓塞控制出血是可行的,但可能具有挑战性,本系列中 20%的临床失败率反映了这种复杂性。栓塞前创伤评估参数和栓塞技术的标准化可能会改善结果。