Wada Aya, Nakamura Yasuka, Kawajiri Maiko, Takeishi Yoko, Yoshida Mikako, Yoshizawa Toyoko
Physical Fitness Research Institute, Meiji Yasuda Life Foundation of Health and Welfare, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Women's Health Nursing & Midwifery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 14;7:e48637. doi: 10.2196/48637.
Working pregnant women often need to adjust their physically demanding jobs for a healthy pregnancy. However, uncertainty about the extent of these adjustments can hinder their effectiveness. To address this, we developed the Job Adjustment mobile app, which allows users to input job and health details to generate a variety of personalized action plans. As this is the first version of the app, assessing its feasibility and usability is crucial.
This study aims to verify the feasibility and usability of the Job Adjustment mobile app.
A longitudinal observational study was conducted on pregnant Japanese women who were allowed to use the app anytime from 12 to 34 weeks of gestation; they received reminder emails every 2 weeks encouraging app use. A questionnaire was administered before app use and at 20 and 32 weeks of gestation. Feasibility was evaluated across 4 domains: implementation, demand, acceptability, and adverse events. Implementation was evaluated based on 3 parameters: dropout rate, initial reminder email receipt rate, and adherence rate (measured as pregnant women who used the app at intervals of 2.5 weeks or less). Demand was measured by intervals between use and intervals between log-in, and participants answered 15 questions to assess acceptability. Adverse events were assessed by analyzing the degree of anxiety related to work. Demographic data were analyzed to determine any statistically significant differences in intervals between uses. Usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale.
The analysis included 66 pregnant women, and 61% (n=40) of them were multipara. The dropout rate, adherence rate, and initial reminder email receipt rate were 18% (13/71), 44% (29/66), and 79% (52/66) respectively. The median intervals between use and intervals between log-in were 2.94 (IQR 2.00-5.13) weeks and 2.28 (IQR 1.81-4.00) weeks, respectively. Overall, 60% (35/58) to 90% (52/58) of the participants responded positively to all 15 questions assessing acceptability, and no anxiety regarding work was recorded. The mean System Usability Scale score was 66.1 points. Multipara women had significantly longer intervals between app use compared to primipara women (P=.01).
The results demonstrated acceptable levels of feasibility and usability of the app. However, the low adherence rates, especially among multipara women, suggest the need for modifications to reduce the time burden of the app. Further research should explore more effective and acceptable intervals between use and timing, involving a larger sample and accounting for diverse characteristics of pregnant women.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000042943; https://tinyurl.com/ydrchfas.
在职孕妇通常需要调整对身体要求较高的工作,以实现孕期健康。然而,这些调整的程度存在不确定性,可能会影响其效果。为解决这一问题,我们开发了“工作调整”移动应用程序,用户可以输入工作和健康细节,生成各种个性化行动计划。由于这是该应用程序的首个版本,评估其可行性和可用性至关重要。
本研究旨在验证“工作调整”移动应用程序的可行性和可用性。
对怀孕的日本女性进行了一项纵向观察性研究,她们在妊娠12至34周期间可随时使用该应用程序;每2周会收到提醒邮件,鼓励她们使用应用程序。在使用应用程序前以及妊娠20周和32周时进行问卷调查。从四个方面评估可行性:实施情况、需求、可接受性和不良事件。基于三个参数评估实施情况:退出率、初始提醒邮件接收率和依从率(以每隔2.5周或更短时间使用该应用程序的孕妇人数衡量)。通过使用间隔和登录间隔来衡量需求,参与者回答15个问题以评估可接受性。通过分析与工作相关的焦虑程度来评估不良事件。分析人口统计学数据,以确定使用间隔是否存在任何统计学上的显著差异。使用系统可用性量表评估可用性。
分析纳入了66名孕妇,其中61%(n = 40)为经产妇。退出率、依从率和初始提醒邮件接收率分别为18%(13/71)、44%(29/66)和79%(52/66)。使用间隔和登录间隔的中位数分别为2.94(IQR 2.00 - 5.13)周和2.28(IQR 1.81 - 4.00)周。总体而言,60%(35/58)至90%(52/58)的参与者对评估可接受性的所有15个问题都给出了积极回答,且未记录到与工作相关的焦虑。系统可用性量表的平均得分为66.1分。与初产妇相比,经产妇使用应用程序的间隔时间显著更长(P = 0.01)。
结果表明该应用程序的可行性和可用性处于可接受水平。然而,依从率较低,尤其是经产妇,这表明需要进行改进以减轻应用程序的时间负担。进一步的研究应探索更有效且可接受的使用间隔和时间安排,纳入更大的样本并考虑孕妇的不同特征。
UMIN临床试验注册中心UMIN000042943;https://tinyurl.com/ydrchfas 。