Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vaccine Clinical Research, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1519-1531. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2281882. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
To identify and synthesize evidence regarding how coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) interventions, including vaccines and outpatient treatments, have impacted healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs in the United States (US) during the Omicron era.
A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify articles published between 1 January 2021 and 10 March 2023 that assessed the impact of vaccination and outpatient treatment on costs and HCRU outcomes associated with COVID-19. Screening was performed by two independent researchers using predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Fifty-eight unique studies were included in the SLR, of which all reported HCRU outcomes, and one reported costs. Overall, there was a significant reduction in the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization for patients who received an original monovalent primary series vaccine plus booster dose vs. no vaccination. Moreover, receipt of a booster vaccine was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization vs. primary series vaccination. Evidence also indicated a significantly reduced risk of hospitalizations among recipients of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r), remdesivir, sotrovimab, and molnupiravir compared to non-recipients. Treated and/or vaccinated patients also experienced reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, and emergency department (ED)/urgent care clinic encounters.
The identified studies may not represent unique patient populations as many utilized the same regional/national data sources. Synthesis of the evidence was also limited by differences in populations, outcome definitions, and varying duration of follow-up across studies. Additionally, significant gaps, including HCRU associated with long COVID and various high-risk populations and cost data, were observed.
Despite evidence gaps, findings from the SLR highlight the significant positive impact that vaccination and outpatient treatment have had on HCRU in the US, including periods of Omicron predominance. Continued research is needed to inform clinical and policy decision-making in the US as COVID-19 continues to evolve as an endemic disease.
确定并综合有关 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)干预措施(包括疫苗和门诊治疗)如何影响美国(美国)在奥密克戎时代的医疗资源使用(HCRU)和成本的证据。
进行了系统文献综述(SLR),以确定 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 10 日期间发表的评估疫苗接种和门诊治疗对 COVID-19 相关成本和 HCRU 结果影响的文章。筛选由两名独立研究人员使用预定义的纳入/排除标准进行。
SLR 共纳入 58 项独特的研究,其中所有研究均报告了 HCRU 结果,一项研究报告了成本。总体而言,与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接受原始单价初级系列疫苗加加强剂量的患者 COVID-19 相关住院的风险显著降低。此外,与初级系列疫苗接种相比,接受加强疫苗接种与住院风险降低相关。与非接受者相比,接受奈玛特韦/利托那韦(NMV/r)、瑞德西韦、索托维单抗和莫努匹韦的患者住院风险也显著降低。接受治疗和/或接种疫苗的患者也减少了重症监护病房(ICU)入院、住院时间和急诊部(ED)/紧急护理诊所就诊。
所确定的研究可能不能代表独特的患者群体,因为许多研究使用了相同的区域/国家数据源。由于研究之间人群、结局定义和随访时间的不同,证据的综合也受到限制。此外,还存在显著的差距,包括与长期 COVID 和各种高危人群以及成本数据相关的 HCRU。
尽管存在证据差距,但 SLR 的结果强调了疫苗接种和门诊治疗对美国 HCRU 的重大积极影响,包括奥密克戎流行时期。随着 COVID-19 继续作为一种地方性疾病演变,需要继续研究为美国的临床和政策决策提供信息。