Duan J J, Ning T, Bai M, Zhang L, Li H L, Liu R, Ge S H, Wang X, Yang Y C, Ji Z, Wang F X, Sun Y S, Ba Y, Deng T
Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):967-972. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220901-00591.
To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (=1.609, 95% 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (=0.598, 95% 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.
为了在现实世界中探索三线治疗中化疗再挑战对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的疗效。回顾性收集了2013年1月至2020年12月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受过基于奥沙利铂和/或伊立替康化疗后疾病进展并接受三线化疗再挑战的mCRC患者的临床病理数据、治疗信息、近期治疗疗效、不良事件和生存数据。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并用Cox比例风险模型分析预后因素。共纳入95例mCRC患者。其中,32例患者(33.7%)单纯接受化疗,63例患者(66.3%)接受化疗联合靶向药物治疗。83例患者接受双药化疗(87.4%),其中35例患者再次挑战奥沙利铂,48例患者再次挑战伊立替康。其余12例患者接受三药化疗方案(12.6%)。其中,5例患者在一线治疗中序贯应用了奥沙利铂和伊立替康,其三线治疗同时再次挑战了奥沙利铂和伊立替康;7例患者之前仅用过奥沙利铂,这些患者在三线治疗中再次挑战奥沙利铂。总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别达到8.6%(8/93)和61.3%(57/93)。中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)分别为4.9个月和13.0个月。最常见的不良事件是白细胞减少(34.7%)和中性粒细胞减少(34.7%),其次是胃肠道不良反应,如恶心(32.6%)和呕吐(31.6%)。3-4级不良事件主要为血液学毒性。Cox多因素分析显示,性别(=1.609,95% 1.016-2.548)和一线治疗的无进展生存期(=0.598,95% 0.378-0.947)是独立的预后因素。结果表明,mCRC患者选择三线化疗再挑战是安全有效的,尤其是对于一线治疗无进展生存期超过一年的患者。