• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术I型F法:低位直肠癌的传统机器人切除术。

Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer.

作者信息

Tao Fang, Liu Dong-Ning, He Peng-Hui, Luo Xin, Xu Chi-Ying, Li Tai-Yuan, Duan Jin-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330052, Jiangxi Province, China.

Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330052, Jiangxi Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct 27;15(10):2142-2153. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142.

DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142
PMID:37969697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10642453/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

METHODS

From September 2018 to February 2022, 206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery (R-NOSES I-F group) and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection (RLRC group). Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1 (1.7 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.6, = 0.003) and shorter postoperative anal venting time (2.7 ± 0.6 3.5 ± 0.7, < 0.001) than those in the RLRC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, TNM stage, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, or inflammatory response ( > 0.05). Postoperative anal and urinary functions, as assessed by Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome, and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores, were similar in both groups ( > 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. It improves pain relief, promotes gastrointestinal function recovery, and helps avoid incision-related complications.

摘要

背景

使用经自然腔道标本取出手术I型F法(R-NOSES I-F)进行机器人切除术是一种治疗低位直肠癌的新型微创手术策略。然而,目前关于该方法的文献仅限于病例报告,因此有必要进一步研究其安全性和可行性。

目的

评估R-NOSES I-F治疗低位直肠癌的安全性和可行性。

方法

2018年9月至2022年2月,南昌大学第一附属医院206例诊断为低位直肠癌的患者纳入本回顾性分析。其中,22例行R-NOSES I-F手术(R-NOSES I-F组),76例行传统机器人辅助低位直肠癌切除术(RLRC组)。收集并分析所有患者的临床病理资料。比较两组患者的术后结局和预后。使用SPSS软件进行统计分析。

结果

R-NOSES I-F组患者术后第1天的视觉模拟疼痛评分显著低于RLRC组(1.7±0.7对2.2±0.6,P = 0.003),术后肛门排气时间也更短(2.7±0.6对3.5±0.7,P < 0.001)。两组在性别、年龄、体重指数、肿瘤大小、TNM分期、手术时间、术中出血、术后并发症或炎症反应方面无显著差异(P > 0.05)。根据Wexner、低位前切除综合征和国际前列腺症状评分评估,两组患者术后的肛门和排尿功能相似(P > 0.05)。长期随访显示,两组的局部复发率和远处转移率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

R-NOSES I-F是一种治疗低位直肠癌的安全有效的微创手术。它能减轻疼痛,促进胃肠功能恢复,并有助于避免与切口相关的并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a0/10642453/67694a13c301/WJGS-15-2142-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a0/10642453/efeca76ea2e2/WJGS-15-2142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a0/10642453/67694a13c301/WJGS-15-2142-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a0/10642453/efeca76ea2e2/WJGS-15-2142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a0/10642453/67694a13c301/WJGS-15-2142-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer.机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术I型F法:低位直肠癌的传统机器人切除术。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct 27;15(10):2142-2153. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142.
2
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China).机器人经自然腔道标本取出术与机器人经腹腔标本取出术治疗早期直肠癌的多中心倾向评分匹配分析(中国)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4521-4530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10995-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.比较经自然腔道取标本机器人手术与经腹部取标本机器人手术治疗中低位直肠癌的近期疗效分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02216-y.
4
Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助自然腔道标本提取术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期疗效。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 4;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03083-w.
5
[Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].[162例直肠肿瘤患者机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191017-00453.
6
[Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].基于倾向评分匹配法比较经自然腔道标本取出手术与传统腹腔镜辅助腹部切口手术治疗直肠癌的中长期疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 25;24(8):698-703. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20210104-00010.
7
[Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].腹腔镜辅助经自然腔道标本取出手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗左半结肠癌的比较:一项随访3年的随机对照研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 25;25(7):604-611. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220129-00040.
8
Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.机器人自然腔道标本取出术与传统腹腔镜中低位直肠癌前切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):607-618. doi: 10.1002/jso.26552. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
[Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].经阴道标本取出的机器人辅助直肠癌根治术治疗高位直肠癌的短期临床疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1124-1130. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.006.
10
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术与传统机器人结直肠癌切除术的安全性和有效性比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 15;18(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01904-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery: the feasibility of robotic natural orifice transluminal extraction colectomy and robotic no-incision colectomy in colorectal practice.拓展微创手术的边界:机器人经自然腔道取标本结肠切除术及机器人无切口结肠切除术在结直肠手术中的可行性
Ann Coloproctol. 2025 Aug;41(4):346-353. doi: 10.3393/ac.2025.00647.0092. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
2
Comparative analysis of safety and effectiveness between natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in robot-assisted colorectal cancer resection through systematic review and meta-analysis.通过系统评价和荟萃分析比较机器人辅助结直肠癌切除术中经自然腔道标本取出术与传统经腹标本取出术的安全性和有效性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 3;18(1):360. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02106-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term and long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) in rectal cancer: a comparison study of NOSES and non-NOSES.直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)的短期和长期结局:NOSES与非NOSES的比较研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Apr;10(8):488. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1175.
2
Male urogenital function after robot-assisted and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.男性机器人辅助与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌后泌尿生殖功能:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 May 14;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01592-1.
3
Robotic Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Potential, Challenges, and Opportunities.
LASSO-based nomogram predicts the risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome for middle and low rectal cancer underwent robotic surgery.基于 LASSO 的列线图预测中低位直肠癌行机器人手术后发生低位前切除综合征的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3378-3387. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10863-2. Epub 2024 May 7.
直肠癌的机器人手术:潜力、挑战与机遇。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jul;23(7):961-979. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00984-y. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants.中国和美国 2022 年癌症统计数据:概况、趋势和决定因素。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.
5
Inflammation-Related Biomarkers for the Prediction of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients.炎症相关生物标志物预测结直肠癌患者预后。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 27;22(15):8002. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158002.
6
Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.机器人自然腔道标本取出术与传统腹腔镜中低位直肠癌前切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):607-618. doi: 10.1002/jso.26552. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Levels of Inflammation Markers Are Associated with the Risk of Recurrence and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.炎症标志物水平与结直肠癌患者的复发风险和全因死亡率相关。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jun;30(6):1089-1099. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1752. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.自然腔道标本取出手术与传统腹腔镜辅助切除术治疗结直肠癌的倾向性评分匹配研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Mar 9;13:2247-2257. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S291085. eCollection 2021.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis.机器人辅助直肠癌根治术与经自然腔道取标本的机器人直肠癌根治术的临床疗效和预后因素:匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 30;10(1):12848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69830-1.