Friedman Kevin G, McCrindle Brian W, Runeckles Kyle, Dahdah Nagib, Harahsheh Ashraf S, Khoury Michael, Lang Sean, Manlhiot Cedric, Tremoulet Adriana H, Raghuveer Geetha, Selamet Tierney Elif Seda, Jone Pei-Ni, Li Jennifer S, Szmuszkovicz Jacqueline R, Norozi Kambiz, Jain Supriya S, Yetman Angela T, Newburger Jane W
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2022 Jun 17;1(4):174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2022.05.007. eCollection 2022 Aug.
The impact of adjunctive anti-inflammatory treatment on outcomes for patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) and coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) is unknown.
Using data from the International KD Registry in patients with ≥ medium CAA we evaluate associations of treatment with outcomes and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Medium or large CAA was present in 527 (32%) patients. All were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), 70% were male, and the median age was 1.3 years (interquartile range: 0.4-4.0 years). The most common acute therapies included single IVIG alone in 243 (46%), multiple IVIG in 100 (19%), multiple IVIG + corticosteroids in 75 (14%), and multiple IVIG + infliximab + corticosteroids in 44 (8%) patients. Patients who received therapy beyond single IVIG had a larger CA -score at baseline ( < 0.001) and a higher rate of bilateral CAA ( < 0.001). Compared with IVIG alone, early adjunctive treatments (within 3 days of initial IVIG) were not associated with time to CAA regression or MACE, whereas later adjunctive therapy was associated with MACE and longer time to CAA regression. Patients receiving IVIG plus steroids vs IVIG alone had a trend towards shorter time to CAA regression and lower risk of MACE ( = 0.07). A larger CAA -score at baseline was the strongest predictor of an increase in the CAA -score over follow-up, lower likelihood of CAA regression, and higher risk of MACE.
Persistence of CAA and MACE are more strongly associated with baseline severity CAA than with acute adjuvant anti-inflammatory therapy. Patients who received late adjunctive therapy are at higher risk for worse outcomes.
辅助性抗炎治疗对川崎病(KD)合并冠状动脉瘤(CAA)患者预后的影响尚不清楚。
利用国际KD注册中心中患有≥中度CAA患者的数据,我们评估了治疗与预后及主要不良心脏事件(MACE)之间的关联。
527例(32%)患者存在中度或大型CAA。所有患者均接受静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗,70%为男性,中位年龄为1.3岁(四分位间距:0.4 - 4.0岁)。最常见的急性治疗方法包括:243例(46%)患者单独使用单次IVIG,100例(19%)患者使用多次IVIG,75例(14%)患者使用多次IVIG + 皮质类固醇,44例(8%)患者使用多次IVIG + 英夫利昔单抗 + 皮质类固醇。接受单次IVIG以外治疗的患者在基线时的CA评分更高(<0.001),双侧CAA发生率更高(<0.001)。与单独使用IVIG相比,早期辅助治疗(在初始IVIG治疗后3天内)与CAA消退时间或MACE无关,而后期辅助治疗与MACE及更长的CAA消退时间有关。接受IVIG加类固醇治疗的患者与单独接受IVIG治疗的患者相比,CAA消退时间有缩短趋势且MACE风险较低(P = 0.07)。基线时较高的CAA评分是随访期间CAA评分增加、CAA消退可能性降低及MACE风险较高的最强预测因素。
CAA持续存在和MACE与基线时CAA的严重程度关联更强,而非与急性辅助抗炎治疗相关。接受后期辅助治疗的患者预后较差的风险更高。