Suppr超能文献

基于尼泊尔人口与健康调查的卫生研究领域贫困指数的构建与验证:一项方法学研究。

Construction and validation of the area level deprivation index for health research: A methodological study based on Nepal Demographic and Health Survey.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0293515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293515. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Area-level factors may partly explain the heterogeneity in risk factors and disease distribution. Yet, there are a limited number of studies that focus on the development and validation of the area level construct and are primarily from high-income countries. The main objective of the study is to provide a methodological approach to construct and validate the area level construct, the Area Level Deprivation Index in low resource setting. A total of 14652 individuals from 11,203 households within 383 clusters (or areas) were selected from 2016-Nepal Demographic and Health survey. The index development involved sequential steps that included identification and screening of variables, variable reduction and extraction of the factors, and assessment of reliability and validity. Variables that could explain the underlying latent structure of area-level deprivation were selected from the dataset. These variables included: housing structure, household assets, and availability and accessibility of physical infrastructures such as roads, health care facilities, nearby towns, and geographic terrain. Initially, 26-variables were selected for the index development. A unifactorial model with 15-variables had the best fit to represent the underlying structure for area-level deprivation evidencing strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). Standardized scores for index ranged from 58.0 to 140.0, with higher scores signifying greater area-level deprivation. The newly constructed index showed relatively strong criterion validity with multi-dimensional poverty index (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.77) and relatively strong construct validity (Comparative Fit Index = 0.96; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.94; standardized root mean square residual = 0.05; Root mean square error of approximation = 0.079). The factor structure was relatively consistent across different administrative regions. Area level deprivation index was constructed, and its validity and reliability was assessed. The index provides an opportunity to explore the area-level influence on disease outcome and health disparity.

摘要

在低资源环境下构建和验证区域水平结构

尼泊尔区域剥夺指数。本研究的主要目的是提供一种构建和验证区域水平结构的方法,即低资源环境下的区域剥夺指数。该研究从 2016 年尼泊尔人口与健康调查中选择了来自 383 个(或地区)簇内的 11203 户家庭的 14652 名个体。指数的发展包括以下几个步骤:识别和筛选变量、变量简化和因素提取,以及可靠性和有效性评估。从数据集中选择能够解释区域剥夺潜在结构的变量。这些变量包括:住房结构、家庭资产以及道路、医疗设施、附近城镇和地理地形等物理基础设施的可用性和可及性。最初,有 26 个变量被选入指数开发。具有 15 个变量的单因素模型最适合代表区域剥夺的潜在结构,表现出较强的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.93)。指数的标准分数范围为 58.0 至 140.0,分数越高表示区域剥夺程度越高。新构建的指数与多维贫困指数(Pearson 相关系数 = 0.77)具有较强的标准有效性,与构建有效性(比较拟合指数 = 0.96;Tucker-Lewis 指数 = 0.94;标准化根均方残差 = 0.05;均方根误差逼近 = 0.079)也具有较强的一致性。该指数的因子结构在不同行政区之间相对一致。构建了区域剥夺指数,并评估了其有效性和可靠性。该指数为探索区域水平对疾病结局和健康差异的影响提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe2/10653511/a33a23c4a38a/pone.0293515.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验