Xiang Xiaoyong, Ji Zhe, Jin Jing
Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:110012. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110012. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries from its inception to June 2023, for eligible studies in which patients underwent brachytherapy for rGBM. Outcomes of interest were mOS, mPFS, OS, PFS, and adverse events (AEs). For individual clinical survival outcomes and common AEs, weighted-mean descriptive statistics were calculated as a summary measure using study sample size as the weight. The calculation formula is as follows: weighted-mean = Σwx/Σw (w is the sample size and x is the outcome).
This review included 29 studies with a total of 1202 rGBM patients, including 22 retrospective and 7 prospective studies. The results showed that from the time of brachytherapy, the mOS and mPFS were 6.8 to 24.4 months and 3.7 to 11.7 months. The OS of 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, and 3 years after brachytherapy were 58.3 % to 85.2 % (weighted-mean 76.2 %), 26 % to 66 % (weighted-mean 41.9 %), 20 % to 37 % (weighted-mean 27.6 %), 11 % to 23 % (weighted-mean 14.8 %), and 8 % to 15 % (weighted-mean 12.1 %), respectively. The PFS of 6 months and 1 year after brachytherapy were 26.7 % to 86 % (weighted-mean 53.4 %) and 14 % to 81 % (weighted-mean 24.1 %). Most patients with rGBM will experience treatment failure again during the follow-up period, mainly local (10.7 % to 79.4 %) or marginal(3.6 % to 22.2 %) recurrence, followed by distant failure (6.7 % to 57.7 %). Although therapeutic AEs had not been uniformly reported, the overall toxicity rate was considered to be low. The common AEs reported included progressive neurologic deterioration, seizures, CSF leak, brain necrosis, hemorrhage, and infection/meningitis, with a weighted-mean incidence of 1.9 %, 2.4 %, 4.1 %, 5.4 %, 2.1 %, and 3.8 %, respectively.
The evidence summarized above, albeit mostly level III, suggests that brachytherapy has acceptable safety and good post-treatment clinical efficacy for selected patients with rGBM. Well-designed, high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled and prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.
评估近距离放射治疗作为复发性胶质母细胞瘤(rGBM)患者挽救治疗的临床疗效和毒性。
我们检索了从数据库建立至2023年6月的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以查找符合条件的研究,即患者接受rGBM近距离放射治疗的研究。感兴趣的结局指标为中位总生存期(mOS)、中位无进展生存期(mPFS)、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件(AE)。对于个体临床生存结局和常见AE,采用加权均值描述性统计作为汇总指标,以研究样本量作为权重进行计算。计算公式如下:加权均值=Σwx/Σw(w为样本量,x为结局指标)。
本综述纳入了29项研究,共1202例rGBM患者,其中包括22项回顾性研究和7项前瞻性研究。结果显示,从近距离放射治疗开始计算,mOS和mPFS分别为6.8至24.4个月和3.7至11.7个月。近距离放射治疗后6个月、1年、18个月、2年和3年的OS分别为58.3%至85.2%(加权均值76.2%)、26%至66%(加权均值41.9%)、20%至37%(加权均值27.6%)、11%至23%(加权均值14.8%)和8%至15%(加权均值12.1%)。近距离放射治疗后6个月和1年的PFS分别为26.7%至86%(加权均值53.4%)和14%至81%(加权均值24.1%)。大多数rGBM患者在随访期间会再次出现治疗失败,主要为局部复发(10.7%至79.4%)或边缘复发(3.6%至22.2%),其次为远处复发(6.7%至57.7%)。尽管治疗AE的报告并不统一,但总体毒性率被认为较低。报告的常见AE包括进行性神经功能恶化、癫痫发作、脑脊液漏、脑坏死、出血和感染/脑膜炎,加权平均发生率分别为1.9%、2.4%、4.1%、5.4%、2.1%和3.8%。
上述证据尽管大多为III级,但表明近距离放射治疗对于选定的rGBM患者具有可接受的安全性和良好的治疗后临床疗效。需要设计良好、高质量、大样本的随机对照和前瞻性研究来进一步验证这些发现。