• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[中国周口2022年冬季雾霾污染期间细颗粒物的特征与成因]

[Characteristics and Cause of PM During Haze Pollution in Winter 2022 in Zhoukou, China].

作者信息

Ma Ying-Ge, Yang Lu, Di Rui-Miao, Ma Nan, Qiao Li-Ping, Wu Yu-Hang, Zhou Wen-Xin, Zhao Xin-Hua, Zhang Yue, Sun Zhi-Hua, Chen Chang-Hong, Chen Xue-Jun, Lou Sheng-Rong, Huang Cheng

机构信息

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Formation and Prevention of Urban Air Pollution Complex, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Science, Shanghai 200233, China.

Henan Academy of Ecology and Environmental Science, Zhengzhou 450004, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Nov 8;44(11):5986-5996. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202209093.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202209093
PMID:37973083
Abstract

The characteristics and main factors of causes of haze in Zhoukou in January 2022 were analyzed. Six air pollutants, water-soluble ions, elements, OC, EC, and other parameters in fine particulate matter were monitored and analyzed using a set of online high-time-resolution instruments in an urban area. The results showed that the secondary inorganic aerosols(SNA), carbonaceous aerosols(CA, including organic carbon OC and inorganic carbon EC), and reconstructed crustal materials(CM, such as AlO, SiO, CaO, and FeO, etc.) were the three main components, accounting for 61.3%, 24.3%, and 9.72% in PM, respectively. The concentrations of SNA, CA, CM, and SOA were increased, accompanied with higher AQI. The sulfur oxidation rate(SOR) and nitrogen oxidation rate(NOR) in January were 0.53 and 0.46, respectively. The growth rates[μg·(m·h)] of sulfate and nitrate were 0.027(-5.89-9.47, range) and 0.051(-23.1-12.4), respectively. During the haze period, the growth rates of sulfate and nitrate were 0.13 μg·(m·h)and 0.24 μg·(m·h), which were 4.8 and 4.7 times higher than the average value of January, respectively. Although the sulfur oxidation rate was greater than the nitrogen oxidation rate, the growth rate of nitrate was approximately 1.8 times that of sulfate owing to the difference in the concentration of gaseous precursors and the influence of relative humidity. The growth rates of nitrate in SNA were significantly higher than those of sulfate on heavily polluted days. The values of SOR, NOR, and concentrations of SNA and SOA during higher AQI and humidity periods were higher than those in lower AQI and humidity periods. The O(NO+O) decreased with the increase in relative humidity. The SOA was higher at nighttime, increasing faster with the humidity than that in daytime. Under the situation of lower temperature, higher humidity, and lower wind speed, the emission of gaseous precursors of SNA requires further attention in Zhoukou in winter. Advanced control strategies of emissions of SO and NO, such as mobile sources and coal-burning sources, could reduce the peak of haze in winter efficiently.

摘要

对2022年1月周口市雾霾的特征及主要成因进行了分析。利用城区一套在线高时间分辨率仪器对细颗粒物中的六种空气污染物、水溶性离子、元素、有机碳(OC)、元素碳(EC)及其他参数进行了监测与分析。结果表明,二次无机气溶胶(SNA)、碳质气溶胶(CA,包括有机碳OC和无机碳EC)以及重构地壳物质(CM,如AlO、SiO、CaO和FeO等)是三个主要成分,在PM中分别占61.3%、24.3%和9.72%。SNA、CA、CM和二次有机气溶胶(SOA)的浓度升高,同时空气质量指数(AQI)也更高。1月份的硫氧化率(SOR)和氮氧化率(NOR)分别为0.53和0.46。硫酸盐和硝酸盐的增长率[μg·(m³·h)]分别为0.027(-5.89 - 9.47,范围)和0.051(-23.1 - 12.4)。在雾霾期间,硫酸盐和硝酸盐的增长率分别为0.13 μg·(m³·h)和0.24 μg·(m³·h),分别比1月平均值高4.8倍和4.7倍。尽管硫氧化率大于氮氧化率,但由于气态前体浓度的差异和相对湿度的影响,硝酸盐的增长率约为硫酸盐的1.8倍。在重度污染日,SNA中硝酸盐的增长率显著高于硫酸盐。在AQI和湿度较高时期,SOR、NOR以及SNA和SOA的浓度高于AQI和湿度较低时期。O(NO + O)随相对湿度增加而降低。SOA在夜间更高,随湿度增加的速度比白天更快。在冬季周口市,在低温、高湿和低风速的情况下,SNA气态前体的排放需要进一步关注。对SO₂和NOₓ排放的先进控制策略,如移动源和燃煤源,可有效降低冬季雾霾峰值。

相似文献

1
[Characteristics and Cause of PM During Haze Pollution in Winter 2022 in Zhoukou, China].[中国周口2022年冬季雾霾污染期间细颗粒物的特征与成因]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Nov 8;44(11):5986-5996. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202209093.
2
[Formation and Size Distribution of the Secondary Aerosol Inorganic Ions in Different Intensity of Haze in Qingdao, China].[中国青岛不同雾霾强度下二次气溶胶无机离子的形成与粒径分布]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Jul 8;38(7):2667-2678. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201612042.
3
Characteristics of the secondary water-soluble ions in a typical autumn haze in Beijing.北京典型秋季霾中二次水溶性离子的特征
Environ Pollut. 2017 Aug;227:296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.076. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Characteristics and formation mechanisms of winter haze in Changzhou, a highly polluted industrial city in the Yangtze River Delta, China.中国长三角高度污染工业城市常州冬季霾的特征及其形成机制。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Oct;253:377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
[Composition and variation characteristics of atmospheric carbonaceous species in PM 2.5 in Taiyuan, China].[中国太原PM2.5中大气含碳物种的组成及变化特征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 Mar;36(3):780-6.
6
Role of secondary aerosols in haze formation in summer in the Megacity Beijing.二次气溶胶在北京这个特大城市夏季雾霾形成中的作用。
J Environ Sci (China). 2015 May 1;31:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.08.026. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
7
Elaborations of the influencing factors on the formation of secondary inorganic aerosols in a heavily polluted urban area of China.详细阐述了中国重污染城区中二次无机气溶胶形成的影响因素。
J Environ Sci (China). 2024 Apr;138:406-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
8
[Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Three Haze Pollution Processes in Chengdu in Winter].[成都冬季三次霾污染过程的特征及形成机制]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Oct 8;41(10):4382-4391. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202002130.
9
[Spatiotemporal Variations in Fine Particulate Matter and the Impact of Air Quality Control in Zhengzhou].[郑州市细颗粒物的时空变化及空气质量控制的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 May 8;42(5):2179-2189. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202009208.
10
[Chemical Characteristics and Sources of Atmospheric Aerosols in the Surrounding District of a Heavily Polluted City in the Southern Part of North China].[中国北方南部一个重污染城市周边地区大气气溶胶的化学特征与来源]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Mar 8;43(3):1159-1169. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202107166.