• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析非基于车道的异质交通中城市环岛碰撞严重程度级别的影响因素。

Analyzing the factors affecting the crash severity level at urban roundabouts in non-lane-based heterogeneous traffic.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Jun;31(2):181-193. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2023.2279967. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1080/17457300.2023.2279967
PMID:37975862
Abstract

Pivotal crash factors are investigated, and crash-severity model for the safety assessment at roundabouts and its vicinity in non-lane based heterogenous traffic is developed. An ordered-probit model was developed using crash-data collected between 2015-2019 for 20 roundabouts in India. The analysis revealed critical influencing parameters for determining the severity-level of crash outcomes at roundabouts, namely, inscribed-circle diameter, height of central island, number of circulatory lanes, presence of splitter island and median, posted-speed limit, type of collision, type of violation behaviour, collision partner, the pattern of collision, presence of road lane-marking, presence of street-light and age of victims. To precisely quantify the impact of each significant factor, marginal effects analysis was also carried out. The results show that the probability of fatal-injuries increased by 14.28% due to angle-collision, 15% for hit-pedestrians, 20.6% due to the pattern of collision and 15.60% due to the collision-partner, Whereas the probability of occurrence of grievous injury was the highest for rear-end with 17%, followed by sideswipe collision with 16% respectively. This study's findings can aid in developing effective remedies to reduce the crash severity for roundabouts road-users and updating the roundabout design standards, considering the safety perceptive.

摘要

研究关键碰撞因素,并为非车道基础异质交通中的环岛及其附近区域开发安全评估的碰撞严重度模型。使用 2015 年至 2019 年在印度 20 个环岛收集的碰撞数据开发了有序概率模型。分析揭示了确定环岛碰撞后果严重程度的关键影响参数,即内接圆直径、中心岛高度、回旋车道数量、分流岛和中央分隔带的存在、规定限速、碰撞类型、违规行为类型、碰撞伙伴、碰撞模式、道路车道标记的存在、路灯的存在和受害者的年龄。为了准确量化每个重要因素的影响,还进行了边际效应分析。结果表明,由于角度碰撞,致命伤害的概率增加了 14.28%;由于行人碰撞,增加了 15%;由于碰撞模式,增加了 20.6%;由于碰撞伙伴,增加了 15.60%。对于追尾碰撞,重伤发生的概率最高,为 17%,其次是侧面碰撞,为 16%。本研究的结果可以帮助制定有效的补救措施,以降低环岛道路使用者的碰撞严重程度,并考虑到安全因素,更新环岛设计标准。

相似文献

1
Analyzing the factors affecting the crash severity level at urban roundabouts in non-lane-based heterogeneous traffic.分析非基于车道的异质交通中城市环岛碰撞严重程度级别的影响因素。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Jun;31(2):181-193. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2023.2279967. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
Identifying crash patterns on roundabouts.识别环岛的碰撞模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.927576.
3
Exploring factors contributing to crash injury severity on rural two-lane highways.探索农村双车道公路上导致碰撞伤害严重程度的因素。
J Safety Res. 2015 Dec;55:171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
Long-term crash trends at single- and double-lane roundabouts in Washington State.华盛顿州单车道和双车道环岛的长期碰撞趋势。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Explaining variation in safety performance of roundabouts.解释环岛的安全性能差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.019. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
6
Safety Index for evaluation of urban roundabouts.城市环形交叉路口评价安全指数。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Dec;178:106858. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106858. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
7
Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations.分析信号控制和无信号控制路段的行人碰撞事故伤害严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
A safety analysis of roundabouts and turbo roundabouts based on Petri nets.基于 Petri 网的环岛和涡轮环岛的安全性分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(4):400-405. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1594208. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists.用于减少骑车人骑行受伤的自行车基础设施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD010415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2.
10
Prevalence and pattern of lower extremity injuries due to road traffic crashes in Fako Division, Cameroon.喀麦隆法科分区道路交通事故所致下肢损伤的患病率及模式
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jan 30;32:53. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.53.17514. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Road Traffic Injuries Mortality in India: An Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2021.印度道路交通伤害死亡率趋势:基于1990 - 2021年全球疾病负担研究的分析
J Prev (2022). 2025 Feb;46(1):59-82. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00811-0. Epub 2024 Oct 15.