• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法医和非法医灵活果断社区治疗服务的客户与专业人员之间的差异。

Differences Between Clients and Professionals of Forensic and Nonforensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Forensic Psychiatric Centre de Rooyse Wissel.

出版信息

J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(2):E21-E32. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000463. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000463
PMID:37976056
Abstract

RATIONALE

Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) has been adapted for application with clients with criminal justice involvement (forensic FACT [ForFACT]). Differences have been found between clients of ForFACT services and clients of nonforensic FACT services; however, less is known about differences in behaviors. Furthermore, because of the different guiding frameworks and goals of treatment, and the difference in clients' presenting problems, it is possible professionals also differ in terms of specialist skills they need and in areas of care they deem important.

METHOD

The current study used an online survey among professionals of ForFACT and non-ForFACT teams to gain insight into mental disorders and clients' presenting behavioral problems and to gain insight into the level of forensic vigilance needed by professionals of both services. We also gathered information pertaining to important areas of care and what both groups of professionals view as key nursing interventions.

RESULTS

ForFACT clients differ from non-ForFACT clients in terms of the clients' presenting psychiatric problems. Furthermore, ForFACT professionals indicated they encounter more clients who show aggressive and (sexually) transgressive behavior. ForFACT professionals were found to score higher on forensic vigilance; however, no differences pertaining to important areas of care and key nursing interventions were found.

CONCLUSION

These findings further strengthen the notion that ForFACT clients are a different group compared with non-ForFACT clients, and professionals need different skills. Organizations could provide tailored supervision and training to ForFACT professionals.

摘要

原理

灵活果断社区治疗(FACT)已被改编为适用于有刑事司法涉入的客户(法医 FACT [ForFACT])。已经发现 ForFACT 服务的客户与非法医 FACT 服务的客户之间存在差异;然而,关于行为方面的差异知之甚少。此外,由于治疗的指导框架和目标不同,以及客户呈现的问题不同,专业人员在所需的专业技能和他们认为重要的护理领域方面也可能存在差异。

方法

本研究使用在线调查,针对 ForFACT 和非 ForFACT 团队的专业人员,了解精神障碍和客户呈现的行为问题,并了解这两种服务的专业人员所需的法医警惕水平。我们还收集了与重要护理领域相关的信息,以及这两个专业群体认为的关键护理干预措施。

结果

在呈现的精神科问题方面,ForFACT 客户与非 ForFACT 客户不同。此外,ForFACT 专业人员表示,他们遇到更多表现出攻击性和(性)越轨行为的客户。ForFACT 专业人员在法医警惕性方面的得分更高;然而,在重要护理领域和关键护理干预措施方面没有发现差异。

结论

这些发现进一步强化了这样一种观点,即与非法医 FACT 客户相比,ForFACT 客户是一个不同的群体,专业人员需要不同的技能。组织可以为 ForFACT 专业人员提供量身定制的监督和培训。

相似文献

1
Differences Between Clients and Professionals of Forensic and Nonforensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment.法医和非法医灵活果断社区治疗服务的客户与专业人员之间的差异。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(2):E21-E32. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000463. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
Dutch Forensic Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: Operating on the Interface Between General Mental Health Care and Forensic Psychiatric Care.荷兰法医灵活主动社区治疗:在普通精神卫生保健与法医精神病护理的界面上开展工作。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 22;12:708722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708722. eCollection 2021.
3
Forensic and nonforensic clients in assertive community treatment: a longitudinal study.在积极社区治疗中的法医和非法医客户:一项纵向研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1;64(5):437-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200170.
4
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
5
[Forensic (flexible) assertive community treatment: client characteristics and treatment outcomes].[法医(灵活)积极社区治疗:服务对象特征与治疗结果]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2017;59(4):212-220.
6
Essential Elements of Forensic Assertive Community Treatment.法医积极社区治疗的基本要素。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021;29(4):278-297. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000299.
7
Assertive community treatment (ACT) case managers' professional identities: A focus group study.坚定的社区治疗(ACT)个案经理的专业身份:一个焦点小组研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Dec;25(6):579-587. doi: 10.1111/inm.12211. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
Program planning and staff competencies for forensic assertive community treatment: ACT-eligible versus FACT-eligible consumers.法医积极社区治疗的项目规划和人员能力:符合 ACT 标准与符合 FACT 标准的消费者。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):90-7. doi: 10.1177/1078390310392374.
9
[Forensic (F)ACT: a study exploring indication, risk assessment and recidivism].[法医(F)ACT:一项探索指征、风险评估和再犯情况的研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2018;60(10):672-681.
10
Practice informs the next generation of behavioral health and criminal justice interventions.实践为下一代行为健康和刑事司法干预措施提供信息。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 22.