HIAS-University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
ICUB-University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Ann Sci. 2024 Jan-Apr;81(1-2):79-99. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2023.2282772. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
The instrumental character of Francis Bacon's natural and experimental histories was often noted, but never fully investigated. In this paper I aim to reconstruct the theoretical and methodological background which supports this feature. I claim that we can read large parts of the second book of Bacon's as a guide to laboratory practices; and that it was read in this manner by some of Bacon's seventeenth century followers. Key to this guide is Bacon's theory of prerogative instances which, in turn, provides the grounding for a whole theory of instruments of detection and instruments of measurement. I show, in particular, how Bacon suggested that such instruments can be used for 'charting' virtues and powers; a process in which instruments of detection can be transformed into instruments of measurement. I also show that Bacon's views on instruments entail an elaborated conception of measurement which departs from the ethos of artisanal perfection. Instead of pursuing the 'best results', Bacon's instrumental natural and experimental histories aim to offer a large enough corpus of correlations, estimates and calculations which, taken together, can represent more or less accurately changes and variations of natural virtues and powers.
弗朗西斯·培根的自然和实验历史的工具性特征经常被注意到,但从未被充分研究。本文旨在重建支持这一特征的理论和方法论背景。我认为,我们可以把培根的第二本书的大部分内容解读为实验室实践指南;并且,它被培根的一些 17 世纪的追随者以这种方式阅读。这个指南的关键是培根的特权实例理论,反过来,为整个检测工具和测量工具理论提供了基础。我特别展示了培根如何建议这些工具可以用于“描绘”美德和力量;在这个过程中,检测工具可以转化为测量工具。我还表明,培根关于工具的观点需要一种精心构思的测量概念,这种概念背离了手工艺完美的精神。培根的工具性自然和实验历史不追求“最佳结果”,而是旨在提供足够大的相关性、估计值和计算值的集合,这些值加在一起,可以或多或少准确地代表自然美德和力量的变化和变化。