Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nutr Neurosci. 2024 Aug;27(8):899-912. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2023.2277970. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
Available evidence points to a possible role of Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) in mood disorders. This is the first systematic review to map the associations between SCFA levels and mood disorder symptoms. Following the PRISMA guidelines, the databases PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for studies that assessed SCFA levels in human populations with mood disorder symptoms, or animal models of mood disorder. Risk of bias was assessed by the Strengthening of Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. 19 studies were included and could be divided into animal (=8) and human studies (=11), with the animal studies including 166 animals and 100 controls, and the human studies including 662 participants and 330 controls. The studies were characterized by heterogeneity and methodological challenges on multiple parameters, limiting the validity and transferability of findings. Notably, only two of the clinical studies assessed the presence of mood disorder with diagnostic criteria, and no studies of mania or bipolar disorder met the inclusion criteria. Despite significant methodological limitations, associations between SCFA levels and depressive symptoms were reported in most of the studies. However, the direction of these associations and the specific SCFAs identified varied. The quantification of SCFA levels in mood disorders is an emerging yet sparsely studied research field. Although there is some evidence suggesting a link between SCFAs and depressive symptoms, the directionality of effects and mechanisms are unclear and the relation to manic symptoms is uninvestigated.
现有证据表明短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)可能在情绪障碍中发挥作用。这是首次对 SCFA 水平与情绪障碍症状之间的关联进行系统综述。根据 PRISMA 指南,在 PubMed、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库中搜索了评估具有情绪障碍症状的人群或情绪障碍动物模型中 SCFA 水平的研究。使用观察性研究的流行病学报告质量(STROBE)清单评估偏倚风险。纳入了 19 项研究,可分为动物研究(=8)和人类研究(=11),动物研究包括 166 只动物和 100 只对照,人类研究包括 662 名参与者和 330 名对照。这些研究在多个参数上存在异质性和方法学挑战,限制了研究结果的有效性和可转移性。值得注意的是,只有两项临床研究使用诊断标准评估了情绪障碍的存在,并且没有符合纳入标准的躁狂症或双相情感障碍研究。尽管存在显著的方法学局限性,但大多数研究报告了 SCFA 水平与抑郁症状之间存在关联。然而,这些关联的方向和确定的特定 SCFAs 有所不同。情绪障碍中 SCFA 水平的定量是一个新兴但研究甚少的研究领域。尽管有一些证据表明 SCFAs 与抑郁症状之间存在关联,但作用的方向性和机制尚不清楚,与躁狂症状的关系也尚未研究。