• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无花果蜡蚧(半翅目:粉蚧科)的移动与种群统计学:用于实验室研究的同生群生成方法

Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) movement and demography: methods for generating cohorts for laboratory studies.

作者信息

Sisterson Mark S, Uchima Sean Y

机构信息

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, 9611 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648-9757, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2024 Feb 12;117(1):118-126. doi: 10.1093/jee/toad210.

DOI:10.1093/jee/toad210
PMID:37978043
Abstract

Planococcus ficus (Signoret) is a worldwide pest of grapevine. Mealybugs overwinter under bark and move into the grape canopy as the season progresses. Because crawlers are more active than later stages, mealybug movement behavior is likely to be stage specific. To quantify P. ficus demography and movement behavior, a series of laboratory experiments were conducted. First, P. ficus populations were monitored on grapevine seedlings to describe survival, change in size, timing of male pupation, and timing of oviposition over a 6-wk period. Subsequently, cohorts of mealybugs were generated by infesting grapevines with crawlers and holding infested grapevines for a specified duration of 0 (crawlers), 1, 2, 3, or 4 wk. Crawlers (0-wk) were more likely to move upwards and towards a light source, than all other age cohorts tested. Further, mealybugs from 4-wk-old cohorts were more likely to move downward than all other age cohorts tested. Results suggest that crawlers are more likely to move to the top of grapevines by moving upwards and orienting towards either the sun or the moon than all other age cohorts tested, whereas older gravid females are more likely to move downward. Passive movement of mealybugs on farm machinery or animals requires surviving a host free period. To quantify risk of passive movement, establishment rates and effects of starvation on each age cohort were quantified. Larger and older mealybugs were more likely to establish on grapevines than smaller and younger mealybugs. Further, mealybug longevity in absence of food was greater for older cohorts compared to younger cohorts. Crawlers survived an average of 2 days without food, whereas females from 4-wk-old cohorts survived for an average of 11 days without food. Further, 70% of starved females from 4-wk-old cohorts deposited fertile eggs. In the absence of food, some mealybugs from cohorts aged 2-, 3-, and 4-wk formed pupa with viable males emerging. Adult males from starved nymphs lived for an average of 3 days post-emergence. Results provide methods for producing cohorts of mealybugs of predictable size and stage and provides insight into P. ficus demography and movement behavior.

摘要

无花果臀纹粉蚧(Signoret)是一种危害全球葡萄树的害虫。粉蚧在树皮底下越冬,随着季节推进迁移至葡萄树冠层。由于若虫比后期虫态更活跃,粉蚧的移动行为可能具有虫态特异性。为了量化无花果臀纹粉蚧的种群统计学特征和移动行为,进行了一系列实验室实验。首先,在葡萄幼苗上监测无花果臀纹粉蚧种群,以描述其在6周时间内的存活率、体型变化、雄虫化蛹时间和产卵时间。随后,通过用若虫侵染葡萄树并将受侵染的葡萄树放置特定时长(0周(若虫)、1周、2周、3周或4周)来组建粉蚧群组。与所有其他测试的龄期群组相比,若虫(0周龄)更倾向于向上移动并朝着光源移动。此外,4周龄群组的粉蚧比所有其他测试的龄期群组更倾向于向下移动。结果表明,与所有其他测试的龄期群组相比,若虫通过向上移动并朝着太阳或月亮方向定向,更有可能移动到葡萄树顶部,而老龄孕雌虫更有可能向下移动。粉蚧在农业机械或动物上的被动移动需要在无寄主时期存活下来。为了量化被动移动的风险,对每个龄期群组的定殖率和饥饿影响进行了量化。体型较大和龄期较大的粉蚧比体型较小和龄期较小的粉蚧更有可能在葡萄树上定殖。此外,老龄群组的粉蚧在无食物情况下的寿命比幼龄群组更长。若虫平均在无食物情况下存活2天,而4周龄群组的雌虫平均在无食物情况下存活11天。此外,4周龄群组中70%饥饿的雌虫产下了可育卵。在无食物情况下,2周龄、3周龄和4周龄群组的一些粉蚧形成蛹,有能存活的雄虫羽化。饥饿若虫羽化出的雄成虫羽化后平均存活3天。研究结果提供了产生可预测大小和虫态的粉蚧群组的方法,并深入了解了无花果臀纹粉蚧的种群统计学特征和移动行为。

相似文献

1
Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) movement and demography: methods for generating cohorts for laboratory studies.无花果蜡蚧(半翅目:粉蚧科)的移动与种群统计学:用于实验室研究的同生群生成方法
J Econ Entomol. 2024 Feb 12;117(1):118-126. doi: 10.1093/jee/toad210.
2
The Vine Mealybug Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) Damaging Vineyards in Brazil.葡萄粉蚧,即无花果臀纹粉蚧(西尼奥雷)(半翅目:粉蚧科),对巴西葡萄园造成损害。
Neotrop Entomol. 2016 Aug;45(4):449-51. doi: 10.1007/s13744-016-0396-8. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
Citrus mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) movement and population dynamics in an arbor-trained vineyard.柑橘粉蚧(半翅目:粉蚧科)在藤本果园中的移动和种群动态。
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Jun;103(3):619-30. doi: 10.1603/ec09234.
4
Interaction Between Linepithema micans (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the Vine Mealybug Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae): Trophobiosis or Predation?米氏丝蚁(膜翅目:蚁科)与葡萄粉蚧(半翅目:粉蚧科)之间的相互作用:共生取食还是捕食?
Environ Entomol. 2018 Oct 3;47(5):1209-1215. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy089.
5
Influence of mating disruption on the reproductive biology of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), under field conditions.在田间条件下,交配干扰对烟粉虱(半翅目:粉虱科)生殖生物学的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Dec;74(12):2806-2816. doi: 10.1002/ps.5067. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Association between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the vine mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in table-grape vineyards in Eastern Spain.在西班牙东部的藤本葡萄园里蚂蚁(膜翅目:蚁科)与蔓粉蚧(同翅目:粉蚧科)之间的关系。
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Dec;73(12):2473-2480. doi: 10.1002/ps.4640. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Transmission of Grapevine Leafroll Viruses by Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and Ceroplastes rusci (Hemiptera: Coccidae).葡萄叶卷病毒通过无花果粉蚧(半翅目:粉蚧科)和红蜡蚧(半翅目:蚧科)传播。
Plant Dis. 2009 Oct;93(10):999-1002. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-10-0999.
8
Microbial associates of the vine mealybug Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) under different rearing conditions.不同饲养条件下葡萄粉蚧(半翅目:粉蚧科)的微生物共生体
Microb Ecol. 2015 Jan;69(1):204-14. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0478-2. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Transmission of Grapevine Ampelo- and Vitiviruses by the Bohemian Mealybug Šulc ().通过 Bohemian 粉蚧传播葡萄藤韧皮部和木质部病毒(Šulc ())。
Viruses. 2022 Jun 29;14(7):1430. doi: 10.3390/v14071430.
10
Hot-water treatments for control of Planococcus ficus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on dormant grape cuttings.热水处理对休眠葡萄插条上的无花果粉蚧(同翅目:粉蚧科)的防治效果
J Econ Entomol. 2005 Aug;98(4):1109-15. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.4.1109.